Religion & Law

Elizabeth Scalia takes the anti-bullying conversation in an interesting (and, in my view, helpful) direction:

I wonder if [the Church's] bishops and religious leaders will, for example, have to acknowledge with loving support the numerous celibate homosexual priests who, throughout history and still today, serve her faithfully, courageously, and with great joy. Such an acknowledgment could go a long way repairing that disconnect that keeps everyone talking about tolerance while walking away from it.



It would speak to the value of the human person as he is created; it would reinforce the church?s own teaching that the homosexual inclination is not in-and-of-itself sinful; in a sex-saturated culture where ?gay? has become in some minds synonymous with ?promiscuous? and both heterosexual and homosexual couples see no particular value in chastity, it would present the radical counter-narrative.



Most importantly, such an acknowledgment would be call of olly-olly-oxen free for the church herself. Battered by the revelations of the past decade, poorly served by past psychological studies suggesting that child abusers could be ?cured? and therefore distrustful of more recent findings that homosexuals are no more inclined to pedophilia than heterosexuals, the church has reflexively pulled the curtains over a number of her priests, and in doing so, she has hidden the idea of ?acceptable otherness? from a flock that is sorely in need to see some of it.