Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Supreme Court weighs whether parents can sue vaccine makers; Congress set up a fund years ago to compensate parents whose children suffered bad side effects; judges have said that law bars lawsuits against manufacturers"

"Supreme Court weighs whether parents can sue vaccine makers; Congress set up a fund years ago to compensate parents whose children suffered bad side effects; judges have said that law bars lawsuits against manufacturers": David G. Savage will have this article Wednesday in The Los Angeles Times.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Justices divided on allowing lawsuits in childhood vaccine cases."

In Wednesday's edition of USA Today, Joan Biskupic will have an article headlined "Case tests vaccine court vs. state-law claims."

The Washington Times has a news update headlined "Supreme Court considers consequences in vaccine case."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court appears split by infant vaccination case; The Supreme Court hears arguments in a lawsuit filed against the manufacturer of a vaccine that left a 6 month old girl developmentally impaired."

Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal reports that "High Court Superstars Take Shots in Vaccine Case."

Bill Mears of CNN.com reports that "High court divided over vaccine safety appeal."

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that "Vaccine Makers Get Mixed Reception From U.S. Justices."

Reuters reports that "Confused Supreme Court to decide on vaccine suits."

And this evening's broadcast of NPR's "All Things Considered" contained an audio segment entitled "Supreme Court Hears Case On Vaccine Lawsuits" featuring Nina Totenberg.

Full post as published by How Appealing on October 13, 2010 (boomark / email).