ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Marler Blog

Non-E. coli O157:H7 STECS: What You Need To Know?

By Bill Marler, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Screen shot 2010-10-14 at 3.48.47 PM.pngSo, said the headline in my favorite online magazine – Cattlenetworks yesterday.

What the American Meat Institute thinks you need to know:

On August 18, AMI sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Vilsack outlining a path FSIS should take to address nSTECs prior to making a regulatory decision.

1. FSIS should have a transparent public policy decision-making process, which is based on sound science resulting in quantifiable improvements to public health outcomes.

2. Prior to any regulatory actions, FSIS should commission a baseline study of the nSTECs to determine the prevalence of nSTECs in the production of ground beef and the beef components that may be used to manufacture of ground beef, which is necessary for a systematic evaluation for the public health risk of nSTECs.

3. AMI also recommended that a risk assessment should be performed to determine if current preventative food safety processes for E. coli O157:H7 are adequate for nSTECs, identify knowledge gaps that need further research, identify areas of potential food safety vulnerability to nSTECs and ultimately determine the public health risk of nSTECs in the production of ground beef and the beef components that may be used to manufacture ground beef.

4. A baseline study and a risk assessment for nSTECs are necessary as critical first steps in developing a systematic preventative process control program for nSTECs in raw beef production.

5. AMI recommended that if FSIS decides to regulate nSTECs in beef products further, it should only be done through a scientifically-based and transparent regulatory process and only if such regulatory action will quantifiably improve public health.

What I think you need to know:

Non-O157 STECs (like O26, O45, 0103, O111, O121, and O145) cause 36,700 illnesses, 1,100 hospitalizations and 30 deaths in America each year.

 Read my full arguments here.

Full post as published by Marler Blog on October 14, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.014 secs (new cache)