Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyAdding an ?Act? to Overcome the Proposed Act/Omission Limitation on Federal Power
By Orin Kerr
I very much appreciate Randy?s response to my latest post; It?s really terrific to have this discussion with him. While I have him on the line, I wanted to push Randy a bit on the act/omission distinction.
If the constitutional line is between acts and omissions, as Randy suggests, then I gather Randy would agree that Congress could circumvent this restriction by prohibiting an affirmative act together with failure to buy health insurance. That?s what Congress did when it wanted to require sex offenders to register, for example. Under that recent law, a person who is supposed to register as a sex offender is guilty of a federal crime if he crosses a state line and has failed to register. The ?act? is the crossing of state lines, even though the real goal is to require sex offenders to register. The circuit courts have so far unanimously upheld this prohibition as being within Congress?s power.
Given that, I?d be interested in Randy?s view of what ?acts? Congress could legitimately use to overcome the proposed act/omission distinction in the case of the individual mandate. Here are four possibilities:
a) Congress prohibits the affirmative act of crossing state lines after having failed to purchase health insurance.
b) Congress prohibits the affirmative act of using a means of interstate commerce, such as the Internet or the telephone system, after having failed to purchase health insurance.
c) Congress prohibits the affirmative act of using the postal service after having failed to purchase health insurance.
d) Congress prohibits the affirmative act of purchasing of any item in interstate commerce after having failed to purchase health insurance.
If the Supreme Court were to adopt the proposed act/omission distinction, which ones of these law would be constitutional because they are punishing ?acts? rather than ?omissions?? All of them? None of them?
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on October 18, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Power of Attorney and Living Wills for the aged
Options for caring for aging parents
Estate Planning
Documents: durable power of attorney, living will, letter of instruction, and insurance trust
Grandparents Visitation Rights
Every state lets elderly grandparents petition to visit grandchildren
Living Wills and Powers of Attorney
Laws effecting the elderly
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
$7.5 Million Settlement Proposed in Gillette M3P Power Razor Class Action
$7.5 Million Settlement Proposed in Gillette M3P Power Razor Class Action
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Hospira AC Power Cord Recall
Hospira AC Power Cord Recall
Mercedes-Benz Recalls 85,000 Vehicles for Power Steering Defect
Mercedes-Benz Recalls 85,000 Vehicles for Power Steering Defect
RadioShack
Power Supplies Recalled
Best Buy
Recalls Portable Power Sources

Preamble not limiting when duplicative of claim limitations and not added to overcome rejection
Editors: Imperial Judiciary Goes Global
ABA's proposed changes to legal education
Limitation Periods and the Power of Fraudulent Concealment









