Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Food Safety NewsSF Fast Food Toy Ban Too Hot for Pre-Election Vote
By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck
The city's 11-member board of supervisors moved Tuesday to postpone a vote on the controversial measure until Nov. 2.
There were concerns about the timeline for implementing the ordinance if it passed, said Lin-Shao Chin, legislative assistant to the ordinance's primary sponsor, Supervisor Eric Mar.
Chin said Mar's office has been in discussion with various groups, including the California Restaurant Association, McDonald's, and Yum! Brands, owner of KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut.
Implementation is a concern for the restaurants, agreed Daniel Conway, spokesman for the California Restaurant Association, which strongly opposes the measure.
Speaking from Sacramento, Conway said Mar had come to appreciate, through discussions between the two sides, that complying with such a requirement wasn't something the industry could do overnight.
But Tuesday's motion to continue the proposed ordinance was political, as well, Conway said.
Come Nov. 2, San Franciscans will not only be voting for a new governor come Nov. 2 but will also be choosing new supervisors. The city's popular mayor, Gavin Newsom, will term out of office.
Mar may be looking to postpone action on the ordinance until after two potentially negative votes and a promised veto by the mayor are no longer threats, said Conway.
"I think [Mar] did some political calculating," Conway said, "and is waiting."
Santa Clara County, about 40 miles south of San Francisco, enacted a similar measure earlier this year. Whereas Santa Clara's restrictions apply only to restaurants in unincorporated parts of the county, San Francisco's legislation would affect all restaurants serving the city of nearly 800,000 people.
Full post as published by Food Safety News on October 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Pet Food Recall
Diamond Pet Food sets up $3.1 million class action fund for substandard dog food.
Slim-Fast Recalled in US
Slim-Fast recalled in US
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Menu Food
$240,000 settlement reached in Hawaii class action contaminated pet food suit.
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.

Once a Fast Food Junkie, Always a Fast Food Junkie
Vote law appeal likely by early Fall
Perception and Reality: It's Still Fast Food
Health experts doubt fast food for dieters








