Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogKaplan on Pregnant Women's Right to Refuse Medical Treatment
By Lawrence Solum
Margo Kaplan (Brooklyn School of Law) has posted A 'Special Class of Persons': Pregnant Women?s Right to Refuse Medical Treatment after Gonzales V. Carhart (Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 13, No. 1, p. 145, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
-
As several scholars have noted, the Supreme Court?s Gonzales v. Carhart decision upholding the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (PBABA) represents a major departure from its previous abortion jurisprudence. What has received little attention is the ease with which Carhart?s rationale can be imported into cases involving the medical treatment of women who wish to continue their pregnancies to term. This article analyzes the implications of Carhart in a context that has thus far been overlooked and, in doing so, argues that its reasoning is broader and more troubling than the majority acknowledged or perhaps even intended.
While common and constitutional law protects the right to refuse medical treatment, courts have compelled the medical treatment of pregnant women on rare occasions, citing the states? interest in protecting fetal life as recognized in abortion jurisprudence. Until Carhart, abortion jurisprudence provided very limited support for compelled medical treatment of pregnant women more generally. Carhart interprets the state interests in fetal life and maternal health so broadly that it essentially creates new, dubious state interests that, in the context of compelled treatment cases, expand state justifications for requiring medical treatment of pregnant women, even where such treatment would harm women?s health. The expansion of state power to compel medical treatment has disturbing implications for women?s liberty and equality. Carhart paves the way to designating women as a ?special class of persons? who have more limited rights to bodily autonomy and informed consent.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on October 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Steps to avoid
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Health Insurance
Anorexia Treatment Not Covered
Medical Technology
Ventana Medical Systems Inc. pays CytoLogix Corp. $49 million patent infringement settlement.
Intentional Contamination
Northwestern Medical Center pays former orthopedic surgery $4 million medical malpractice settlement.
Medical Malpractice
medical malpractice lawsuit.

ACLU Asks FL Court to Protect Pregnant Women's Right to Refuse Medical Care
Is a Patient Who Believes Jesus Would Save [Me] Competent to Refuse Life-Saving Medical Treatment
When do religious beliefs trump a kid's medical condition
Obamacare Query: If There Is A Right To Refuse ...
Federal District Judge Keeps Pregnant Woman Behind Bars Solely Because of her HIV Status








