Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> OUT-LAW.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: OUT-LAW.comHigh Court confirms 'initial confusion' as principle of EU trade mark law
By Pinset Masons
Full post as published by OUT-LAW.com on October 26, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Gulf War Syndrome
Panel Confirms it's Real, and Identifies Causes
Mark Eagleson
$63,725 restitution settles fraud lawsuit.
Ford F-150 Recall
alleging a hose in the F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT pickup trucks could affect braking power.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

A nice drop of bubbly from the ECJ
Use of Trademark in Keyword Search Caused Initial Interest Confusion
Another pro se litigant smoked at the CAFC
The infringement that never has to say “likelihood of confusion”
Trade mark infringement: who can provide consent







