ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice

Motion to Dismiss Inequitable Conduct Defense for Failure to Satisfy FRCP 9 Denied

By Michael C. Smith

ADVERTISEMENTS

Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft, et al., 2:08cv369 (Oct. 27, 2010)

Judge: Chad Everingham

Holding: Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Inequitable Conduct Defense DENIED

Plaintiff sought to dismiss all Defendants? inequitable conduct affirmative defenses and counterclaims under Rule 12(f) and Rule 12(b)(6), respectively, for failure to comply with Rule 9.

The Court noted that the asserted patents are directed generally to digital video processing technology, and describe the conversion of digital video between formats and authoring of digital video to optical media.  In their answers to Plaintiff?s complaints, Defendants have asserted an inequitable conduct affirmative defense and counterclaim premised on several acts that Defendants allege constitute inequitable conduct. Specifically, Defendants allege that Plaintiff engaged in inequitable conduct by failing to disclose neoDVD, CAMpeg RT, Ulead, and Sonic Solutions prior art, failing to disclose prior rejections in related applications, failing to disclose cited references from related applications, and generally failing to disclose any material information to the patent office.

Judge Everingham reviewed the defendants' allegations regarding inequitable conduct and concluded that "Defendants have pled with particularity as required by Rule 9(b) and have met the heightened pleading standard of Exergen. For each individual alleged act of inequitable conduct, Defendants
have identified at least one individual knew of the withheld information and/or withheld the information, and supported those allegations with facts. Defendants? factual allegations are sufficient to infer a specific intent to deceive."

Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on October 27, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0145 secs (new cache)