Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Nuts & Boalts
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Students
: Nuts & BoaltsHer Day in Court
I went down to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit my first week of work, along with the other shiny young things in my department. Among the arguments we heard was a case involving a Bernie Madoff like Ponzi scheme. The case had gone into receivership, and the appeal was from a woman contesting the receivership plan.
Like pretty much everyone else in the case, she'd lost everything. She was representing herself, because she didn't have the money for a lawyer. Her argument was basically that since she was the last person to invest in the scheme, and since her money had been deposited less than twenty-four hours before the bank froze the account, and since the account still contained more money than she'd put in, she should get all her money back.
Listening to this woman, who had no idea of how the legal system worked or what the law dictated, stand before the court and argue that they should give her money back because that would be fair, was heartbreaking. The problem was that the judge in the trial court had tried to do what was fair - to give all the investors something, even though it would only amount to cents on the dollar. It was hard not to sympathize with her, though, because if she had just put the money in a little later, or if the bank had waited a little longer to clear it, or if the SEC had moved a little quicker, she wouldn't have been standing in that courtroom.
The trial court's ruling was upheld, of course. It's not like the Second Circuit could have done anything else. Which makes me hope that when she got the ruling, and realized she really had lost everything, she at least felt like she'd been heard.
Because sometimes that's all our system can do.
Full post as published by Nuts & Boalts on November 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

A Proposal to Crowdsource Quality Control at the Supreme Court
An increase in the Courts summary docket
An Interesting (although admittedly useless) Fact About the Supreme Court
Contempt of Court (Just a comedy)








