ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Dolan on Religion in the Public Square & Salazar v. Buono

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS

Mary Jean Dolan (The John Marshall Law School) has posted Salazar V. Buono: The Cross Between Endorsement and History (Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 105, p. 42, 2010) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

    Despite its procedural complications and six opinions, Salazar v. Buono provides some potential insights into the Supreme Court?s evolving approach to religion in the public square. Competing approaches have stressed either preserving history or avoiding government endorsement of religion. This Article analyzes a potential new synthesis which is suggested by Justice Kennedy?s plurality opinion and Justice Alito?s concurrence in the judgment.

    The Mojave Cross case involves a war memorial erected in 1934 by WWI veterans on remote federal land, in what later became the Mojave Desert Preserve. In the first round of litigation, the lower courts had found an Establishment Clause violation and enjoined display of the cross. Before the Supreme Court was the validity of a statute transferring the land to the VFW. The plurality remanded to the district court, strongly suggesting that the transfer would end any appearance of government endorsement of religion.

    The Kennedy and Alito opinions can be viewed as describing an expanded endorsement test, which takes the ?reasonable observer? one step further along the ?endorsement test continuum,? by adding another contextual factor to be considered. Both Justices suggested that privatization of a longstanding religious-historical symbol, when done to avoid showing disrespect for military sacrifice, is unlikely to be viewed as a government endorsement of religion. Given the realistic threat that the Roberts? Court will adopt an undiluted historical approach, this Article shows the potential resiliency of endorsement-style contextual analysis, and whether the Salazar v. Buono version can be reconciled with the test?s equality rationale.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on November 02, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)