Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast open letter to Kelly Ayotte, McLane Graf, and Judge Landya McCafferty in 2010-CV-501.

By Christopher King

ADVERTISEMENTS

May it Please the Court and Opposing Counsel:

As noted in this afternoon?s email, I do not plan to seek recusal of Her Honor. I do wish to point out that the background of the participants is relevant and in the spirit of Open Government it is important to know when background material might potentially give rise to a conflict. There?s not doubt that former U.S. Marshal Monier, a former Police Chief, may be biased against me because I regularly harsh on bad LE.

Similarly, it is not unreasonable to suggest that the specter of McLane, Graf all over this case ? Defendant Ayotte, Attorneys Middleton, Parent, Judge McCafferty, her predecessor Judge Muirhead ? might have an undue influence on Her Honor. It is not unforeseeable to believe that Attorney Middleton and others at McLane, Graf past and present helped her obtain her position by way of positive reference. However, I have studied her cases throughout her career and realize that she is able to see many facets of a diamond so we're going to stay right here.

I know that my Internet friend arrestajudgekit takes a more sardonic view of things, and if I were indeed the paranoid, knee-jerk reactionary some paint me out to be I would file for full disclosure and/or recusal.

But instead I put my faith in the system and hope for full candor from everyone going forward, because that is the only principled way to operate. If Her Honor makes an adverse ruling, or decides not to give the Jury the question of liability based on the NAACP cases of NAACP v. Thompson, 648 F.Supp. 195 D.Md.,1986 vis a vis Invisible Empire of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Maryland Chapter v. Town of Thurmont, MD. 700 F.Supp. 281 (1998) (at leagle) then I will appeal toward SCOTUS and I imagine you will do the same if I prevail. To me a permit is a permit, and discrimination based on a Fundamental Right is discrimination based on a Fundamental Right no matter whether it occurs in Maryland, Montana or New Hampshire, and you are aware of course that Thompson was decided under a Federal First Amendment analysis as my case is plead; the NH First Amendment is just niggardly in its protections if read strictly. You've got your work cut out for you to oppress my Free Press Rights regardless of where Judge McCafferty is from, I'll say that much. Because it's not where you're from, it's where you're at.

At any rate, let?s keep it simple, keep it open and keep it real, and have a nice weekend.
Very Truly Yours,
Christopher King, J.D.
KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real People.