Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Marler BlogMajor Article - Clinical Infectious Diseases - Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 Associated with Raw Milk, Connecticut, 2008
By Bill Marler, Esq.

MAJOR ARTICLE - Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 Associated with Raw Milk, Connecticut, 2008
Alice Guh,1,2 Quyen Phan,2 Randall Nelson,2 Katherine Purviance,2 Elaine Milardo,4 Stacey Kinney,2 Patricia Mshar,2 Wayne Kasacek,3 and Matthew Cartter2
1Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; 2Connecticut Department of Public Health and 3Connecticut Department of Agriculture, Hartford, and 4Farmington Valley Health District, Avon, Connecticut
Background. In Connecticut, despite hazards of raw milk consumption, attempts to ban raw milk sales have been unsuccessful. In July 2008, 2 children experienced Escherichia coli O157–associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) after consuming raw milk purchased at a retail market and a farm (farm X). We investigated to determine the outbreak source and control measures.
Methods. Confirmed cases were HUS diagnosis or E. coli O157:NM infections with isolates matching outbreak strains among patients during June to July 2008. Probable cases were diarrheal illness among farm X customers during the same period. We conducted case-control studies to determine the source of E. coli O157 exposure and assess for dose-response relation between illness and frequency of raw milk consumption. Farm X dairy practices were evaluated; stool specimens of humans and animals were cultured for E. coli O157. Staff time and laboratory and medical costs were calculated.
Results. We identified 14 cases (7 confirmed). Five (36%) case patients required hospitalization; 3 (21%) experienced HUS. No deaths were reported. Raw milk consumption was associated with illness (P p .008); a dose- response relation was demonstrated (Pp.01). Dairy practices reflected industry standards. E. coli O157:NM outbreak strains were isolated from stool specimens of 6 case patients and 1 milking cow. The total estimated outbreak cost was $413,402.
Conclusions. Farm X's raw milk was the outbreak source despite no violations of current raw milk regulatory standards. This outbreak resulted in substantial costs and proposed legislation to prohibit nonfarm retail sale, strengthen advisory labels, and increase raw milk testing for pathogens.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010;51:000–000, 1058-4838/2010/5112-00XX, DOI: 10.1086/657304 - See also:
Raw (Unpasteurized) Milk: Are Health-Conscious Consumers Making an Unhealthy Choice?
Michele T. Jay-Russell, Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis
Full post as published by Marler Blog on November 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
VA Clinics
Thousands of Patients at Risk for Infectious Diseases
Possible E. coli O157:H7 Contamination
Prompts Ground Beef Recall
Health Plan Boycott
Connecticut chiropractic groups to pay $87,000 fine in civil suit.
Major Egg Producers
Class Action Filed over Alleged Price Fixing
Clarcon Skin Products
Found to Contain Infectious Bacteria
California Fertility Clinic Warned
For Not Screening for Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Report on 2006 Spinach E. coli O157:H7 Outbreak in Wisconsin, the Counted and the Not-Counted
Salmonella in Unpastuerized Orange Juice, 2005
JBS Beef Recall Expanded - Now 23 E. coli Victims in 9 States
Why does Colorado have so much E. coli
PFGE patterns in Hartmann Dairy raw milk outbreak







