ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> ACLU Newsroom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: ACLU Newsroom

ACLU Says Third-Party Publishers Entitled To First Amendment Protection

By ACLU

ADVERTISEMENTS
Testimony For House Judiciary Committee Hearing On WikiLeaks Says Espionage Act Should Be Narrowed, Not Expanded
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (202) 675-2312 or media@dcaclu.org
 
WASHINGTON – The American Civil Liberties Union today submitted testimony for a congressional hearing on the constitutional issues surrounding the proposed prosecution of WikiLeaks for its publication of government documents and a proposal to expand the Espionage Act. The ACLU's testimony warned of First Amendment concerns that would surround any efforts to prosecute a third-party publisher of classified information and warned that broadening the Espionage Act would exacerbate the First Amendment deficiencies already in the current law.
 
The following excerpts from the ACLU's written testimony can be attributed to Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office and Michael Macleod-Ball, ACLU Legislative Chief of Staff and First Amendment Counsel, the authors of the testimony:
 
'If the Espionage Act were to be applied to publishers, it would have the unconstitutional effect of infringing on the constitutionally protected speech rights of all Americans, and it would have a particularly negative effect on investigative journalism – a necessary and fundamental part of our democracy.
 
'In the current environment, it would be all too easy for inflamed public passions to serve as the basis for arguments to justify broadening even further the proscriptions of the law. Instead, Congress should stand clear-eyed and firm against arguments based on passion, not reason – and narrow the Espionage Act to those who leak properly classified information.
 
'[W]e urge Congress to resist the urge to broaden the Espionage Act's already overbroad proscriptions and, instead, to narrow the Act's focus to those responsible for leaking properly classified information to the detriment of our national security.'
 

Full post as published by ACLU Newsroom on December 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)