Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Nuts & Boalts
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Students
: Nuts & BoaltsNo Laughing Matter
ADVERTISEMENTS
Last night's Daily Show was must-see tv journalism and certainly no joke. On his last show before the holiday break, Jon Stewart devoted nearly the entire episode to taking the Senate--particularly the GOP--to task for making health care for 9/11 first-responders a political football. Stewart sometimes gets too self-righteous for even my taste, but in this case, he was totally justified.
In this first segment, Stewart explains the issue and takes the major networks to task for not covering it:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Worst Responders | ||||
| ||||
In the second, even more heart-wrenching, segment, Stewart interviewed four 9/11 first-reponders now suffering from debilitating illnesses who can't believe the Senate won't help them, or that some Senators have the gall evoke Jesus Christ as their reason for not doing so:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| 9/11 First Responders React to the Senate Filibuster | ||||
| ||||
I called my Senator about this issue, which is something I rarely do. I find the whole thing entirely unbelievable and deeply sad. Can anyone with a better grasp of the process explain to me any good reason for this? Is the issue more complicated than Stewart made it sound, or are politics really that cynical?
Merry fucking Christmas.
Full post as published by Nuts & Boalts on December 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Explicit E-Mail
Adult website fined $413,000 in explicit e-mail matter.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Laughing in Courtroom Leads to Felony Charge
Justice No Laughing Matter for N.C. Judge Who Jails Chuckling Defendant
Free Kindle: Who's Not Laughing About Tethered Electronic Resources
ROBERT GIBBS ANSWER: Theyre not laughing at us, theyre laughing with us! One of Barack Obama
Hughes: Wilberforce Can Free Again









