Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawVacating a Section 3020-a arbitration award
Westhampton Beach UFSD v Ziparo, 275 AD2d 411
It is not unusual for a party to decide to challenge the determination of the hearing officer or panel following a Section 3020-a disciplinary action. Essentially a Section 3020-a decision is treated as an arbitration award and thus the provisions of Article 75 of the Civil Practice Act and Rules [CPLR] control any attempt to vacate such an award.
As the Westhampton Beach decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, demonstrates, the grounds for vacating an award under Article 75 are very limited.
The district filed certain disciplinary charges against David Ziparo. The Section 3020-a hearing officer found him guilty of the charges. The penalty imposed: suspension without pay for one year. In addition, the hearing officer conditioned Ziparo?s return to teaching upon his obtaining a certification of psychiatric fitness.
Westhampton appealed a State Supreme Court?s confirmation of the hearing officer?s determination. The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal, ruling that Westhampton did not demonstrate any basis for vacating the award under CPLR 7511 and the hearing officer?s determination has a rational basis and is supported by the record.
On what basis could a court vacate a determination by a Section 3020-a hearing officer or panel? Section 7511(b)(1) of the CPLR allows a court to vacate or modify an award only if it finds:
1. Corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award; or
2. Partiality of an arbitrator appointed as a neutral, except where the award was by confession;
3. An arbitrator, or agency or person making the award exceeded his power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made; or
4. The failure to follow the procedure set out in Article 75, unless the party applying to vacate the award continued with the arbitration with notice of defect and without objection.
In addition, courts have held that an arbitration award may be vacated if it is inconsistent with a strong public policy.
Another important consideration when deciding whether to challenge a Section 3020-a disciplinary determination: the statute of limitations. Section 3020-a(5) provides that such a challenge must be filed within ten days of the receipt of the decision -- a very short period in which to perfect the appeal.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on December 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
Couple Awarded Nearly One Million Dollars in Lawsuit
Condo Lawsuit Gets $1 Million Award

The Death of Arbitration the 4th Circuits Time Machine
5th holds Manifest disregard of the law no basis for vacating arbitration award
Hall Street: Contract vs. statute
Justice Ginsburg nixes a stay of decision allowing class action arbitration
Supreme Court Limits Grounds for Reviewing Arbitration Awards Under FAA







