Find a Local Lawyer

Close This Box!

The New York Times tells us what most lawyers already know ? that the Supreme Court of the United States is very "business-friendly." Not as much so as the Texas Supreme Court, but that would be a hard record to match.

Please read the article; you may be surprised at the influence big business has on the current court. The bottom line is that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is filing briefs in many cases, and these briefs are apparently swaying the Court to make more decisions favoring business over consumers. Here are a few excerpts:

Almost 40 years ago, a Virginia lawyer named Lewis F. Powell Jr. warned that the nation?s free enterprise system was under attack. He urged the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to assemble ?a highly competent staff of lawyers? and retain outside counsel ?of national standing and reputation? to appear before the Supreme Court and advance the interests of American business.

The chamber now files briefs in most major business cases. The side it supported in the last term won 13 of 16 cases. Six of those were decided with a majority vote of five justices, and five of those decisions favored the chamber?s side. One of the them was Citizens United, in which the chamber successfully urged the court to guarantee what it called ?free corporate speech? by lifting restrictions on campaign spending.

The chamber?s success rate is but one indication of the Roberts court?s leanings on business issues. A new study, prepared for The New York Times by scholars at Northwestern University and the University of Chicago, analyzed some 1,450 decisions since 1953.

It showed that the percentage of business cases on the Supreme Court docket has grown in the Roberts years, as has the percentage of cases won by business interests.

The Roberts court, which has completed five terms, ruled for business interests 61 percent of the time, compared with 46 percent in the last five years of the court led by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who died in 2005, and 42 percent by all courts since 1953.

A study prepared by the Constitutional Accountability Center, a liberal group, examined the center?s success rate in the Supreme Court. It found that the positions supported by the chamber prevailed 68 percent of the time in the Roberts court, compared with 56 percent in the last 11 years of the Rehnquist court, a period without changes in the court?s membership.

A prominent Supreme Court advocate who often represents businesses, Maureen E. Mahoney, chose her words carefully when asked at a chamber news briefing in September whether the Roberts court was especially receptive to the kinds of arguments pressed by corporations.

?The best court for getting a fair hearing on those issues,? she said, ?is the Supreme Court.?