ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> Daily Writing Tips

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Writing

: Daily Writing Tips

The Problem with Grammar Check

By Mark Nichol

ADVERTISEMENTS

A couple of years ago, a visitor to this site posted a comment asking for help. In a Word document, this person had written the sentence ?The nouns and verbs are the main content words in this poem and without emphasis on them, this poem has little to no meaning.? Word?s grammar check admonished the writer to insert a semicolon in place of the comma following them.

What?

Errant nonsense, and puzzling advice, at that. One respondent erroneously agreed with Bill Gates, while two people associated with this site validated the original writer?s reluctance to follow Word?s word. But they didn?t explain why the grammar check had recommended this faulty course of action. I didn?t understand it, either, but then I looked a little closer.

As another poster remarked, a human editor trumps a computer-generated one. Computers may be able to defeat humans at chess, but I doubt they?ll ever beat people at editing. Why? They can compute, but they can?t think. Here?s where Word went wrong:

It assumed that the phrase ?in this poem and without emphasis on them? was a compound phrase with the same structure as ?on this page and on the next,? for example, and that this sentence could end with this phrase.

If that were true, ?this poem has little to no meaning? would be an independent clause that could stand on its own. But because the computer misread the context, it did not admonish the writer to correct a real error: A comma should follow the first instance of poem.

The correct form of the sentence is ?The nouns and verbs are the main content words in this poem, and without emphasis on them, this poem has little to no meaning.? (I also agree with the poster who pointed out that the phrase at the end of the sentence is more idiomatically correct rendered as ?little or no meaning.?)

In this sentence ?this poem has little to no meaning? is not an independent clause, but it is part of one: ?without emphasis on them, this poem has little to no meaning? could stand as a separate sentence, so it should be preceded by a comma and the conjunction and.?

The moral of the story? Word?s grammar check, like its spell-check function, can be helpful, but it can also misinterpret your intent as a writer. As the sage says, ?Trust, but verify.?


Original Post: The Problem with Grammar Check
Your eBook: Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.


Full post as published by Daily Writing Tips on January 07, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)