Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Oregon Legal Research
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Oregon Legal ResearchEffective Dates of (Oregon) Legislation and Ballot Measures
The Oregon Constitution, Article IV, Section 1 (4)(d) says:
?? Notwithstanding section 1, Article XVII of this Constitution, an initiative or referendum measure becomes effective 30 days after the day on which it is enacted or approved by a majority of the votes cast thereon. A referendum ordered by petition on a part of an Act does not delay the remainder of the Act from becoming effective?.?
One could wonder what ?the day on which it is enacted or approved by a majority of the votes cast thereon? means. Is it the date of the election or the date of the certification or the date of a ballot recount, if there is one? Not to over-think it, which lawyers (and law librarians) do all the time, common sense says that it is the date of the election, assuming the measure passed.
To confirm this, I wandered here and there online (it?s too soon for the Measure in question to be anywhere in print given that it passed just last November), from the Legislature?s website to the Secretary of State, Elections Division, website, and beyond, to no avail.
My next starting point became the blog post I wrote back in 2007: Effective Dates of (Oregon) Legislation
I looked at the most recent Bill Drafting Manual (2008) from the Oregon Legislative Counsel, where they state the ?rule,? but they don?t really state the ?law.?
For example, Chapter 12 (1), states: ?Bills referred to the people by the people via statewide referendum petition also take effect on a date other than the normal effective date. That date is 30 days after the date the people approve the referendum.?
So, we?re left with the common sense reading and assumption is that it?s the date of the election, i.e. ?the date the people approve the referendum,? and any subsequent certifications or recounts are merely affirmations of the approval by the voters on election day.
We?ve not heard anything to the contrary so our local attorney and I keep our minds open.
Full post as published by Oregon Legal Research on January 18, 2011 (boomark / email).
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
CVS
Consumer Products Sold Past Their Expirey Dates
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Understaffed Elder Care
Sunwest Management pays $5.5 million in two class action settlements with California and Oregon residents.
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.

Thoughts on some of the 2010 Oregon ballot measures
Ballot measures proposed on Ariz. immigration law
Read News: Oregon joins momentum, introduces racial impact bill
In Oregon and Michigan, ballot politics
Final updates on early turnout for tax measures in Oregon
New California Ballot Measures Research Guide







