ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Denial of an Article 75 petition to vacate an arbitration award requires that the court confirm the award

ADVERTISEMENTS
Denial of an Article 75 petition to vacate an arbitration award requires that the court confirm the award
Matter of Perilli v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2011 NY Slip Op 00229, Appellate Division, Second Department

John Perilli appealed an order of the Supreme Court that denied his Article 75 petition challenging an arbitration award. The Appellate Division sustained the lower court?s determination and dismissed his appeal.

Perilli contended that the arbitrator had [1] prejudiced his rights; [2] improperly admitted evidence of prior grievances he had filed or that had been filed against him; and [3] the arbitrator?s award was against public policy.

The Appellate Division rejected each of Perilli?s contentions.

First the court ruled that Perilli had failed to meet his burden of proving "by clear and convincing evidence" that alleged impropriety or misconduct of the arbitrator prejudiced his rights or the integrity of the arbitration process or award.

As to the arbitrator?s admission of evidence of prior grievances, the court said that ?the admission of evidence of prior grievances filed by and against [Perilli] did not constitute misconduct by the arbitrator,? explaining that "[a]n arbitrator is not bound by principles of substantive law or rules of evidence, and may do justice and apply his or her own sense of law and equity to the facts as he or she finds them to be."

Also rejected by the Appellate Division was Perilli?s motion to vacate the arbitration award on the theory that it violated public policy, holding that ? vacatur of the arbitration award is not warranted [as] the award did not violate a strong public policy, was not irrational, and did not manifestly exceed a specific, enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power."

The Appellate Division also commented that if a motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award is denied, the court, in the alternative, must confirm the award.

Accordingly, as Supreme Court had denied Perilli?s petition seeking to vacate the award, and the Appellate Division had concurred with the lower court?s ruling, the Appellate Division held that the arbitrator's award must be confirmed.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_00229.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on January 19, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/03/26 14:55:14)