Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportHypertouch, Inc. v. ValueClink, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. - Jan. 18, 2011)
By Shaun Martin
ADVERTISEMENTS
Who to root for? Entities who spam deceptive e-mail messages ("Free Gift If You Click Here!") and those that employ them, or someone suing them? So close. Especially when the former says that California's statutes are powerless to stop such misconduct because they're preempted.The trial court sides with the defendants. The Court of Appeal reverses.
And the (happy) crowd goes wild.
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of folks.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on January 18, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

State law spam claim in federal court not pled with required particularity
There won't be a new PGR until fall 2011
Goldman Forecast: Unemployment to Peak in 2011
Is 2011 the End of Law Firm Leverage







