Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Drug Injury Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Drug Injury WatchFirst Fosamax Trial Against Merck In New Jersey State Court Starts In January 2011
By Tom Lamb
This Rosenberg v. Merck Case Involves Woman Who Alleges She Developed Osteonecrosis Of The Jaw (ONJ)
(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)
On January 18, 2011 the first Fosamax trial involving bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) started in the Superior Court for Atlantic County.
According to a (now-expected) Merck press release issued on the morning that this Rosenberg Fosamax ONJ trial started:
In Rosenberg v. Merck, the plaintiff alleges she used FOSAMAX from 1999 to 2006. The plaintiff further alleges she suffered various jaw problems and complications following a tooth extraction in December 2005.
?Unfortunately, the plaintiff had medical problems that cause people to develop jaw problems, regardless of whether they were taking FOSAMAX,? said Christy Jones of Butler, Snow, O?Mara, Stevens & Cannada PLLC, outside counsel for Merck. ?She had an extensive history of periodontal and endodontic treatments and she took a number of powerful steroid medications that are known to suppress the body?s immune system and inhibit the body?s ability to heal. The evidence will show that the plaintiff would have experienced dental and jaw-related problems whether she took FOSAMAX or not.?
"Statement on FOSAMAX® (alendronate Sodium) Product Liability Trial in New Jersey State Court"
This January 2011 NJ Fosamax trial will be presided over by Judge Carol E. Higbee, who is overseeing the New Jersey state court Fosamax "mass tort" litigation -- which, as of December 29, 2010, consisted of 397 Fosamax lawsuits filed against Merck alleging that patients who used Fosamax developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), such as in the Rosenberg case, as well as patients who developed atypical, low-stress femur fractures.
We will monitor the progress of this Rosenberg Fosamax trial in New Jersey and report significant developments as they become publicly available.
______________________________________________________________________________
DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects
Drug Injury Case Evaluation - Free & Confidential
Full post as published by Drug Injury Watch on January 24, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
New Jersey Employment Law
alleged violations of New Jersey state labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Schering Plough, Merck
Settle Multi-State Investigation for $5.4 Million
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Fosamax
Possible Link with Esophageal Cancer
Fosamax ONJ
allegedly causing Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in cancer patients.
Gardasil
Merck's HPV Vaccine Linked to Paralysis

New York Jurors Find Merck Not Liable in Fosamax Bellwether Trial
First Fosamax Trial Against Merck Begins Today
First Fosamax Trial to Begin Next Week
Jawbone Death: Merck Osteoporosis Drug Fosamax Blamed
Mixed Results in Fosamax Lawsuit Trials What does it mean









