Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> AntitrustProf Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: AntitrustProf BlogLegal and Economic Approach to Tying and Other Potentially Unfair and Anticompetitive Commercial Practices: Focus on Financial Services
Full post as published by AntitrustProf Blog on February 08, 2011 (boomark / email).
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
Bailout Bill HR124
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
UBS Financial Services Inc
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
Ford Focus
Consumer Class Action Settles for Cash Refunds
Legal Malpractice
legal malpractice lawsuits.
Diamond Antitrust
De Beers Diamond Company creates $295 million class action fund for anticompetitive gem prices.
Cell Phone Services
AT&T Mobility may have to pay $10 million to Florida customers after charging for third-party services.

Unfair marketing becomes a criminal offence next week
Does the Supreme Court Deem Price Discrimination to be an “Anticompetitive” Effect of Tying
Government gives new guidance on unfair commercial practices
Unfair marketing becomes a criminal offence next week - OUT-LAW.com
FSA warns firms on unfair consumer contract terms
ISP can use unfair practices law to back unlawful interference claim, rules judge







