Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> The Indiana Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Indiana
: The Indiana Law BlogInd. Courts - Comments open on court rule changes until March 25th
Full post as published by The Indiana Law Blog on February 08, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Nationwide Recall Of All Lots Of Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap
Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap All Lots Recalled Nationally
Wegmans Food Market
alleging the retailer revealed too much information on their credit and debit card receipts, violating the FACTA law, and leaving customers open to identity theft
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arugment in More Detainee Cases on March 25th
Ohio Supreme Court "specialized courts" standards
Hamilton County Court of Domestic Relations rule amendment
SCO's Feb. 25th Bankruptcy Hearing Cancelled - Hearings in March Instead
Ohio Supreme Court Accepting Comments on Proposed Rule for Juvenile Court CPO's








