Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyCourt Holds that Data About Car Speed and Brake Usage Stored in Car?s Computer Protected by Fourth Amendment
By Orin Kerr
A California appellate court has handed down a fascinating opinion today in State v. Xinos on whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to data stored in a car?s internal computer that controls the airbags and seatbelts. After a fatal car accident, the police downloaded the data from the impounded car and used it to help reconstruct the accident and convict the driver of vehicular manslaughter. The information from the computer ?showed information captured during the five seconds before defendant?s vehicle experienced a change in velocity. It disclosed the vehicle?s speed during the five seconds before the incident? and showed that the brakes had been activated at that time. Held: The data was protected by the Fourth Amendment, the retrieval of the data was unconstitutional, and the conviction had to be overturned. From the opinion:
We do not accept the Attorney General?s argument that defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the data contained in his vehicle?s SDM. The precision data recorded by the SDM was generated by his own vehicle for its systems operations. While a person?s driving on public roads is observable, that highly precise, digital data is not being exposed to public view or being conveyed to anyone else. . . . We conclude that a motorist?s subjective and reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to her or his own vehicle encompasses the digital data held in the vehicle?s SDM.
The Court also concludes that the computer data is in the car, not outside the car, so the legal standard that governs access to the data probable cause but not a warrant.
Thanks to Fourth Amendment.com for the link.
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 09, 2011 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges
Nissan North America
alleging brake defects that cause the 2005 Infiniti G35 brakes to wear out faster.
Mongoose Youth ATVs
Recalled By KYMCO Due to Loss of Speed Control
Veolia Water
allegedly overestimated water usage for residential customers.
Homelite
Recalls Chain Saws Due to Chain Brake Failure
Mazda Motor Corp.
alleging defective speed control switches can lead to fires.

New law article: "Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data"
FOURTH AMENDMENT STUNNER: Judge Rules That Cell-Site Data Protected By Fourth Amendment Warrant Req
I SOMEHOW MISSED THIS THE OTHER DAY: Court Rules Email Protected by Fourth Amendment. Today, the
Federal Court Rules Emails Protected Under 4th Amendment
Hustinx: nameless data can still be personal








