ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: Blog of Rights

Surveillance Cameras in Chicago: Extensive, Pervasive and Unregulated

By Suzanne Ito, ACLU

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yesterday, the ACLU of Illinois released a new report detailing the threats to privacy Chicagoans face under the watchful eyes of that city's growing surveillance camera system. The report is the first large-scale, independent study of the city's integrated surveillance system — a system former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff deemed the most "extensive and integrated" in the nation.

Perhaps most stunning in this age of continuing economic hardship are the report's details about the staggering cost of purchasing, installing, maintaining and manning the Windy City's Big Brother. While the ranks of Chicago police officers drop due to lack of funding, more than $60 million has been spent on the city's surveillance camera network.

And to what end?

Numerous studies by independent scholars have found that video surveillance cameras do not actually reduce violent crime. For example,  a 2009 study of surveillance cameras in San Francisco found that cameras had no 'statistically significant impact on violent crime' or 'drug crime," and a 2008 report of Los Angeles's cameras found no statistically significant impact on violent crime, property crime or quality of life crime (such as prostitution or public drunkenness).

The Chicago Tribune's Steve Chapman might have put it best last year:

A more complete assessment indicates that when it comes to preventing and solving crimes, the cameras are about as useful as a pet rock. Britain has 4 million of them, but a 2005 report by the British government found little evidence to justify the effort. Video surveillance, it said, "produced no overall effect" on crime.

(That British report, "Assessing the Impact of CCTV," is especially relevant given that the U.K. is, according to a 2007 Privacy International assessment, an "endemic surveillance society.")

Despite this, city officials hope to expand the city's surveillance cameras system even more, making, in the words of Chicago Mayor Richard Daly, a camera "on every corner" a reality.

More details, including how the camera system can chill First Amendment rights, has not solved crimes and has cut into other crucial law enforcement efforts like community policing, are in the report Chicago's Video Surveillance Cameras: A Pervasive and Unregulated Threat to Our Privacy.

Learn more about surveillance: Subscribe to our newsletter, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Full post as published by Blog of Rights on February 09, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)