ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> IRS Problem Solver Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Taxation & Estate Planning

: IRS Problem Solver Blog

Are Refund Anticipated Loans Good or Bad?

By Darrin Mish

ADVERTISEMENTS
There has always been a debate surrounding Refund Anticipated Loans or RALs.  Refund Anticipated Loans are usually taken up by the lower income bracket taxpayers who need or want their tax refunds quickly.  Tax preparers, taking advantage of this demand, would arrange for RALs to give immediate cash advances to those who cannot wait for their refunds.  Naturally, the amount of the loans is limited by the amount of refunds the taxpayers are getting.  And the taxpayer on the other hand, would hand over rights to their refunds to the tax preparers.  Needless to say, the loans come at high interest rates and fees despite the low risk to the lenders.
Essentially, with Refund Anticipated Loans, you are paying interest to borrow money that is already yours, albeit just for a short term, usually for two to four weeks.  Nevertheless, many tax preparers promote the RALs with a lot of hype and make it seem like such a good deal.
At times, these RALs are also known as ?payday loans? as they tide you over until payday.  Certain states, such as Oklahoma have legislation that governs how much interest can be charged for RALs, the amount of loan that can be disbursed and the length of term of the loans.  This acts as a safeguard for the borrowers.
Besides the exorbitant interest rates and high fees, there is another inherent danger in RALs.  If your amount of tax refund is less than the amount of loan you have taken, you are liable to repay the balance and will be charged hefty fees and fines if you are not able to repay the RALs on time.
Did you know that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) regards RALs ?unsafe and unsound??  The FDIC has come up with this stand ever since the IRS has stopped giving information on whether a taxpayer owes outstanding debt for student loans or child support.  Since last August, the IRS has ceased giving out this debt indicator information.
Another regulatory body that has cautioned against RALs is the Office of Comptroller of Currency that has issued a directive against HSBC, the bank that issues RALs for H&R Block.  The directive prohibits HSBC from giving out anymore RALs.
In April last year, JPMorgan Chase exited the RAL market leaving only Republic Bancorp and two other banks as RAL lending banks.  Republic Bancorp works alongside Jackson Hewitt and Liberty Tax Service, the nation?s second and third largest tax preparers.

More on Are Refund Anticipated Loans Good or Bad?

Are Refund Anticipated Loans Good or Bad? is a post from: IRS Tax Problem Solver Blog - IRS Help

tt twitter big2 Are Refund Anticipated Loans Good or Bad?

Are Refund Anticipated Loans Good or Bad? is a post from: IRS Tax Problem Solver Blog - IRS Help

Full post as published by IRS Problem Solver Blog on February 14, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)