.

Google       

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402


Corporate & Securities Law

Antitrust Blog Review Antitrust Blog Review

Provides legal updates in the antitrust and white collar legal arenas.
By Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton, LLP

Post Frequency: 1.8/day

Last Entry: March 29, 2011 at 20:21:38

Recent Entries: 215

Track this blog ()

Go to Antitrust Blog Review, find other Corporate & Securities Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.

Search
This Blog Only All Blogs

Posts

Yes, We Really Do Have Amnesty

Posted on January 09, 2008
District Court Enforces DOJ Corporate Leniency Agreement, Dismisses Indictment Against Stolt-Nielsen And Company ExecutivesOn November 29, 2007, a federal district court in Philadelphia dismissed an indictment charging Stolt-Nielsen, S.A., two of its subsidiaries and two of its executives with violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act in the parcel tanker shipping industry...


Quizno's Franchisees Do Not "Get It Their Way"

Posted on January 09, 2008
Antitrust, Fraud And RICO Claims Are Dismissed Westerfield v. The Quizno's Franchise Company, LLC (E. D. Wis., November 5, 2007).Quizno's operates a chain of fast food restaurants known for their toasted submarine sandwiches.  Plaintiffs, twelve Wisconsin franchisees brought an action under the Sherman Act, RICO, the Wisconsin Anti-Trust Act, and other Wisconsin consumer protection laws in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleging, inter alia, that Quizno's "fraudulently induced plaintiffs and the Class to purchase franchises and thereafter exploited their control and economic power in order to extract exorbitant and unjustifiable payments...


International Highlights

Posted on January 09, 2008
On 19 December 2007, the UK's Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") announced that it had charged three UK businessmen with cartel offences under the Enterprise Act 2002.  The three individuals were charged with dishonestly participating in a cartel to allocate markets and customers, restrict supplies, fix prices and rig bids for the supply of marine hose and ancillary equipment in the UK...


Bankruptcy and Restructuring Law

Posted on January 09, 2008


To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

Corporate & Securities Law

Posted on January 08, 2008


ESOP Law

Posted on January 07, 2008


Fashion & Apparel Law

Posted on December 24, 2007


FCC Law

Posted on December 15, 2007


Financial Institution Law

Posted on December 07, 2007


Court Dismisses Indictment Against Stolt-Nielsen

Posted on December 06, 2007
On November 29, 2007 a federal court in Philadelphia issued a decision granting the motion of Stolt-Nielsen (Stolt), a Luxembourg tanker shipping company, to dismiss a grand jury indictment against it for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act alleging it conspired with its competitors to allocate customers among them...


Ninth Circuit Holds Price Squeeze Claims Survive Trinko

Posted on December 06, 2007
A price squeeze occurs when a vertically integrated company with a monopoly in the upstream market sets its wholesale prices to its customers so high that they cannot compete effectively with it at the downstream level.  In some circumstances, price squeezes may constitute exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act...


The Rules are the Rules: DOJ Obtains Fine for Insubstantial Noncompliance with HSR Act

Posted on December 06, 2007
In October, the Department of Justice obtained a half a million dollar penalty against Iconix Brand Group for omitting "4(c)" documents in its Hart-Scott-Rodino Act premerger notification.  For lawyers and companies involved in mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures, the DOJ's actions make clear that HSR filings, including their more technical aspects, are no minor matter and call for diligence...


The Current Anti-monopoly System of China and Impact of New Anti-monopoly Law

Posted on November 14, 2007
The new Anti-monopoly Law of China (“AML”) was issued on August 30, 2007, although it will not come into effect until August 2008.  During the one year time window, there is no doubt that the existing enforcement system of anti-monopoly will be greatly impacted and amended by this AML...


Monopoly Money

Posted on November 14, 2007
Bundled discounts, the practice of selling multiple products for a single price, are ubiquitous in America, ranging from Happy Meals at your local McDonald's to a single price for telephone, Internet and television service from your local cable or satellite provider...


Previous
Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Bulletins

Related Law Questions

Related Searches
















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











0.033 secs