.

Google       

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402


Labor & Employment Law

California Labor & Employment Defense Blog California Labor & Employment Defense Blog

Providing employers up-to-date information about California employment law, including new cases, legislation, and discussions.

Post Frequency: 2/day

Last Entry: March 30, 2011 at 13:18:53

Recent Entries: 331

Track this blog ()

Go to California Labor & Employment Defense Blog, find other Labor & Employment Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.

Search
This Blog Only All Blogs

Posts

California Labor Commissioner Files Multi-Million Dollar Suit Against Janitorial Companies

Posted on December 20, 2007
In a press release issued by the California Department of Industrial Relations, the agency announced that it has filed a joint lawsuit against Excell Cleaning & Building Services, Inc., and MO Restaurant Cleaning of California, Inc. The lawsuit is seeking damages for unpaid wages and penalties going back to 2003 for janitors who worked for the company...


English-Only Amendment Blocked By US House

Posted on December 19, 2007
The House of Representatives recently passed a $516 billion omnibus spending measure that addresses a number of issues, including the funding of various Cabinet departments and the funding of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. In passing the omnibus bill – which President Bush is expected to eventually sign – Democratic lawmakers were successful in blocking an amendment that would have barred the government from suing employers who try to enforce English only workplace rules...


Court Denies Employee's Attorney Fees For Tort Claims

Posted on December 19, 2007
Apart from being an informative warning about some tactics used by car dealerships to increase the price paid by consumers by using “legs” or “payment packing” techniques, the court’s opinion in Casella v. Southwest Dealer Services, Inc...


After Kakani v. Oracle Are "Claims Made" Class Settlements Obsolete?

Posted on December 14, 2007
In Kakani v. Oracle, 2007 WL 1793774 (N.D.Cal. 2007), Judge Alsop of the Northern District of California denied approval of a proposed class settlement agreement. In doing so, he cast doubt on so-called “claims made” or “reversionary” settlement agreements that are commonly used to settle wage and hour class actions...


To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

Reminder - California Minimum Wage Increases Jan. 1 and Impacts Exempt Employees

Posted on December 07, 2007
As a simple reminder, employers should begin to plan to adjust their payroll systems in order to ensure that all California employees are paid the new minimum wage of $8 per hour starting January 1, 2008.  With this increase, California will tie Massachusetts for the highest minimum wage rate in the country...


CA Supreme Court Grants Review In Harris v. Superior Court

Posted on November 29, 2007
The California Supreme Court granted review of Harris v. Superior Court.  As previously posted about here, the only legal issue reviewed by the lower appellate court was the proper construction and application of the single phrase limiting exempt administrative duties to those that are “directly related to management policies or general business operations...


IRS Mileage Rate Set For 2008

Posted on November 28, 2007
The IRS announced the standard business mileage rate for 2008 is 50.5 cents per mile.  The IRS posted the following on its website yesterday: The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2008 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes...


Much To Be Thankful For

Posted on November 21, 2007
For it is true that everywhere men turn their eyes today much of the world has a truly wild and savage hue. No man, if he be truthful, can say that the specter of war is banished. Nor can he say that when men or communities are put upon their own resources they are sure of solace; nor be sure that men of diverse kinds and diverse views can live peaceably together in a time of troubles...


No "No-Match" Letters For The Rest Of The Year

Posted on November 20, 2007
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced last Friday that it will not be issuing "no-match" letters for the remainder of the year.  The reasons for staying the process of sending out the letters is due to the recent court decision blocking new regulations proposed by the DHS...


UPDATE: House Passes Employment Non-Discrimination Act

Posted on November 09, 2007
The House of Representatives passed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) yesterday by a vote of 235 to 184. As stated in a previous post here, ENDA would ban employment discrimination based on an individual's sexual orientation although the version of the Bill passed by the House, H...


The EEOC's Hard Times Continue

Posted on November 07, 2007
You may have read some of our posts (here for example) about the EEOC’s recent losses and/or dressing downs by the courts. Well, the hits keep on coming, and now it is the U.S. Supreme Court chastising the EEOC for the way it conducts business...


Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks: Positive Ruling for Employers

Posted on November 06, 2007
In Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks, the California Supreme Court shed some light on the relatively unexamined issue by the courts of expense reimbursement. At issue in the case was whether Harte-Hanks could reimburse its outside sales force for mileage by paying a higher “lump sum” in the form of wages and/or commissions, as opposed to paying a specified sum for each mile driven...


California Enacts Military Spouse Leave Law (Effective Immediately)

Posted on November 05, 2007
Governor Schwarzenegger recently signed California Assembly Bill (AB) 392 into law. That bill creates a new leave of absence right for spouses of military personnel while those personnel are on a leave of absence from deployment. Specifically, the military spouse law provides that: Employers with 25 or more employees in the United States to allow eligible employees to take up to 10-days off from work, on an unpaid basis, when his/her spouse is on leave from deployment during a period of military conflict; Eligible employees are defined as employees who work at least an average of 20 hours per week and whose spouse is a member of the United States Armed Forces, National Guard, or Army Reserve on active duty in an area of military conflict; Employees must provide notice to the employer within 2 business days of receiving official notice that his/her spouse will be on a leave from deployment...


Background Checks and References

Posted on November 04, 2007
An employer’s obligations in conducting background checks and providing references for former employees is an extremely nuanced area of employment law and could expose an employer to significant liability. As explained below, conducting background checks/reference checks is critical for employers to defend themselves from negligent hiring/supervision claims...


Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Supreme Court Decision Forthcoming Next Week

Posted on November 02, 2007
The California Supreme Court announced today that it will be issuing a decision on November 5 at 10:00 a.m. in the closely watched mileage reimbursement case.  The Supreme Court issued the following notice: GATTUSO (FRANK) v. HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS, INC...


Three Family Leave Bills Vetoed By Governor

Posted on October 16, 2007
California employers should breath a sigh of relief as Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed three bills that provided for expanded leave rights under California law.  Two of the bills vetoed by the Governor - AB537 and SB727 - proposed to expanded both the unpaid and paid leave programs to include care for a sibling, mother- or father-in-law, grandparent or grandchild...


How To Stop An Ex-Employee From Spreading Rumors Via the Internet

Posted on October 15, 2007
How can a company prevent a former employee from spreading false rumors about the company on the Internet? One answer, as according to Kevin O’Keefe, is counter intuitive. Kevin’s answer to the question in a bit, but first: What are the legal options a company can take to prevent an ex-employee from gossiping about the company on the Internet and possibly hurting the company’s reputation? In California, generally speaking there is not much a company can do...


Previous
Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Bulletins

Related Law Articles

Related Law Questions
Related Searches
















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











0.0282 secs