
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Defense Newsletter Blog 

Breaking news supplementing the Defense Newsletter covering 11th Circuit and Supreme Court Cases.
Post Frequency: 9.1/day Last Entry: October 27, 2020 at 13:19:00 Recent Entries: 355
By Tim Cone
Go to Defense Newsletter Blog, find other Criminal Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Deason: Upholding Enticement and Obscene Transfer Convictions
Posted on July 17, 2020In United States v. Deason, No. 17-12218 (July 17, 2020) (Ed Carnes, Branch, Tjoflat), the Court affirmed the defendant?s convictions for enticement of a minor and attempted transfer of obscene material.First, the Court upheld the denial of a motion to suppress statements made by the defendant in his home without receiving Mirandawarnings...
Gumbs: Upholding Convictions for Forcibly Assault Federal Officers with a Vehicle
Posted on July 15, 2020In United States v. Gumbs, No. 18-13182 (July 15, 2020) (Luck, William Pryor, Jill Pryor), the Court affirmed the defendant?s convictions for using a deadly weapon to forcibly assault a federal officer.First, the Court found no abuse of discretion in refusing to give the defendant?s proposed jury instructions...
Martinez: Upholding Guideline Enhancement for Possessing Gun In Connection With Another Felony
Posted on July 14, 2020In United States v. Martinez, No. 18-12950 (July 14, 2020) (Luck, William Pryor, Jill Pryor), the Court affirmed an enhancement under USSG 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for unlawfully possessing a firearm with knowledge, intent, or reason to believe that it would be used or possessed in connection with another felony...
Chalker: Upholding Healthcare Fraud Convictions Over Various Challenges
Posted on July 13, 2020In United States v. Chalker, No. 18-15102 (July 13, 2020) (Marcus, Wilson, Thapar), the Court affirmed the defendant pharmacist?s healthcare fraud convictions and sentence.First, the Court found that the evidence was sufficient to support convictions for conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and substantive healthcare fraud...
Stein: Upholding Restitution Order and Deeming Other Challenges Barred by the Mandate Rule/Law of Case
Posted on July 13, 2020In United States v. Stein, No. 18-13762 (July 13, 2020) (Marcus, Luck, Ed Carnes), the Court re-affirmed the defendant?s fraud convictions and affirmed an award of restitution.In a previous appeal, the Eleventh Circuit remanded for the district court consider to reconsider its loss finding with respect to restitution...
Ruan: Rejecting Numerous Challenges to Physicians' Convictions for Distributing Opioids
Posted on July 10, 2020In United States v. Ruan, No. 17-12653 (July 10, 2020) (Coogler (ND Ala.), Wilson, Newsom)), the Court, in a 137-page opinion, affirmed all but one the defendant doctors? numerous health-care/opioid related convictions.The Court found sufficient evidence to support convictions for unlawfully prescribing opioids, health care fraud conspiracy, conspiracy to receive kickbacks, mail/fraud wire fraud conspiracy, and RICO conspiracy...
Wetherald: Ex Post Facto Clause, Post-Booker, Applies to Guidelines
Posted on March 29, 2011In U.S. v. Wetherald, No. 09-11687 (March 28, 2011), affirming multiple fraud convictions, the Court held that even though the Guidelines, post-Booker, are not mandatory, the Ex Post Facto Clause still requires a district court not to apply a harsher Guideline that took effect after the defendant?s conduct, unless the district court a sentencing makes clear that it does not feel bound by the more recent, harsher Guidelines...
Beasley: SORNA Criminalizes Non-Registration Only After Travel
Posted on March 29, 2011In U.S. v. Beasley, No. 09-11528 (March 28, 2011), on remand from the United States Supreme Court, the Court vacated a conviction of a defendant convicted of failing to register as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. The Court noted that the Supreme Court?s decision in Carr v...
Valarezo-Orobio: Scutting of vessel was "reasonably foreseeable"
Posted on March 23, 2011In U.S. v. Valarezo-Orobio, No. 10-11222 (March 23, 2011), the Court upheld the imposition of an eight-level Guideline enhancement on a defendant convicted of operating a semi-submersible vessel in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2285. The enhancement applies when the offense involves ?the sinking of the vessel...
Jordan: No selective prosecution where defendant did not rely on evidence regarding similarly-situated defendants
Posted on March 17, 2011In U.S. v. Jordan, No. 10-11534 (March 16, 2011), the Court affirmed a felon in possession of a firearm conviction.The Court rejected Jordan?s Fourth Amendment challenge to his seizure. The Court noted that Jordan?s encounter with police occurred in an ?area known for crime...
Dean: Child Pornography Statute Not Overbroad
Posted on March 17, 2011In U.S. v. Dean, No. 09-16133 (March 16, 2011), the Court rejected challenges to the constitutionality of a statute that makes it unlawful to produce child pornography, 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(a)(2).Dean relied on the First Amendment ?overbreadth? doctrine...
Gamory: Life Sentenced for Drug Dealer
Posted on March 14, 2011In U.S. v. Gamory, No. 09-13929 (March 11, 2011), the Court affirmed drug trafficking and money laundering convictions, and a sentence of life imprisonment.The Court rejected Gamory?s argument that he was wrongly denied a Franks hearing regarding the falsity of an affidavit that supported an application for a search warrant...
Jackson: Rule 32 does not apply to revocation hearings
Posted on March 11, 2011In U.S. v. Jackson, No. 10-13019 (Feb. 24, 2011), the Court affirmed a 21-month sentence imposed on a revocation of supervised release.The Court held that Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(1)(A), which requires a district court to verify at sentencing that the defendant and the defendant?s attorney have read and discussed the presentence report, does not apply to probation office reports prepared for a revocation hearing...
Schmitz: Error to ask "Were-they-lying" questions
Posted on March 08, 2011In U.S. v. Schmitz, No. 09-14452 (March 4, 2011), the Court reversed convictions for theft concerning a program receiving federal funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A), but affirmed mail fraud convictions obtained against an Alabama state legislator who collected $177,000 in salary for a federal program but did little or no work...
Rose: Unpresented mitigation evidence not sufficient for habeas relief
Posted on March 07, 2011In Rose v. McNeil, No. 10-11848 (March 4, 2011), the Court denied habeas relief to a Florida death row inmate sentenced to death for a 1982 murder, rejecting an argument that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present mitigation evidence at the penalty phase of Rose?s trial...
Almanzar: District Court Usurped Role of Jury
Posted on March 04, 2011In U.S. v. Almanzar, No. 10-11481 (March 4, 2011),the Court found that the district court usurped the role of the jury by granting a motion for a judgment of acquittal, after the jury gave a guilty verdict that convicted a defendant of methamphetamine trafficking...
Naranjo: Sufficient Concealment for Money Laundering
Posted on March 03, 2011In U.S. v. Naranjo, No. 08-13814 (March 2, 2011), the Court affirmed concealment money laundering convictions.The Court rejected the argument that the government failed to prove ?concealment.? The Court pointed out that while Naranjo signed the checks from his fraudulent companies, he tried to conceal his association with the bank accounts on which the checks were drawn...
San Martin: Two week lateness bars death row inmate's petition
Posted on February 24, 2011In San Martin v. McNeil, No. 09-14311 (Feb. 23, 2011), the Court rejected as untimely the federal habeas petition filed by a Florida inmate sentenced to death for a 1991 murder.San Martin filed his federal habeas petition two weeks after the one-year deadline of AEPDA...
Julian: 924(j) does not require consecutive sentences
Posted on February 24, 2011In U.S. v. Julian, No. 09-13673 (Feb. 22, 2011), the Court vacated a sentence and remanded for resentencing, because the district court erroneously concluded that it was required by statute to impose consecutive sentences, and lacked discretion to impose concurrent sentences...
Lockley: Florida "Attempted Robbery" is "Crime of Violence"
Posted on February 16, 2011In U.S. v. Lockley, No. 09-15728 (Feb. 11, 2011), the Court held that a prior conviction for ?attempted robbery,? in violation of Fla. Stat. §§ 812.13(1) and 777.04(1) qualified as ?crime of violence? for purposes of the career offender Guideline.The Court noted that the career offender guideline expressly includes ?robbery,? which refers to ?generic? forms of robbery...
Ibarquen-Mosquera: DTVIA is Constitutional (Part 2)
Posted on February 15, 2011In U.S. v. Ibarguen-Mosquera, No. 09-14476 (Feb. 10, 2011), the Court rejected challenges to the constitutionality of the Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act (DTVIA).The Court rejected a challenge based on international law principles, noting that these principles only apply to laws that govern the conduct of flagged vessels, whereas the DTVIA applies to stateless vessels...
Saac: DTVIA is Constitutional (Part I)
Posted on February 15, 2011In U.S. v. Saac, No. 09-14204 (Feb. 9, 2011), the Court upheld the constitutionality of the Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act of 2008 (DTVIA). The defendants were convicted under the DTVIA of operating a semi-submersible vessel in international waters...
Lee: Conspiracy not "Crime of Violence"
Posted on February 04, 2011In U.S. v. Lee, No. 10-10926 (Feb. 2, 2011)the Court held that a prior New Jersey conviction for conspiracy to commit armed robbery did not qualify as a ?crime of violence? for purposes of the Guidelines career offender enhancement, but a prior New Jersey conviction for eluding police did so qualify...
Preacher: Abandonment not applicable defense to using interstate facility for murder
Posted on January 28, 2011In U.S. v. Preacher, No. 10-10492 (Jan. 28, 2011), the Court held that an abandonment defense was not available for the offense of using a facility of interstate commerce with the intent that a murder for hire be committed.Preacher used a cell phone to contact someone with the idea of hiring someone to commit murder...
McDaniel: Child pornography possessor proximately causes harm
Posted on January 28, 2011In U.S. v. McDaniel, No. 09-15038 (Jan. 28, 2011), the Court affirmed a judgment of restitution in favor of a victim of child pornography.The Court noted that although the defendant did not create the child pornography in which the victim was pictured, he possessed the pornography, and was therefore part of the market that supported the creation of this pornography...
Shannon: Purchase is not Possession
Posted on January 26, 2011In U.S. v. Shannon, No. 10-10599 (Jan. 26, 2011), the Court held that a prior conviction for the purchase of cocaine in violation of Florida law did not qualify as a ?controlled substance offense? for purposes of ?career offender? status under the Guidelines...
Jerchower: Amendment 732 was Clarifying Amendment
Posted on January 25, 2011In U.S. v. Jerchower, No. 09-13795 (Jan. 25, 2011), the Court held that Amendment 732 was a ?clarifying amendment? and therefore retroactively applicable.Amendment 732 provides that the ?undue influence? enhancement for defendants convicted of prohibited sexual conduct does not apply when the only ?minor? was an undercover law enforcement officer...
Diaz: Involuntary Medication to Render Defendant Mentally Competent for Trial
Posted on January 14, 2011In U.S. v. Diaz, No. 09-15421 (Jan. 12, 2011), the Court affirmed a district court?s grant of permission to medicate a defendant involuntarily in order to render him mentally competent to stand trial.After reviewing at length the expert reports regarding Diaz?s schizophrenia, and statistical studies regarding the effectiveness of medication, the Court found a ?substantial likelihood that anti-psychotic medication will restore Diaz to competency,? and that this medication ?is not substantially likely to cause side effects that would interfere with Diaz?s ability to assist counsel...
Diaz: Freedom qualified as "thing of value"
Posted on January 14, 2011In U.S. v Townsend, No. 09-12 (Jan. 13, 2011), the Court affirmed convictions of a Miami-Dade County corrections officer, convicted for giving a defendant on pretrial release greater freedoms in exchange for bribes.The Court found that giving greater freedom to a defendant on pretrial release qualified as a ?thing of value of $5,000 or more? for purposes of the bribery statute, 18 U...
Ruff: Appeal Waiver is valid
Posted on January 10, 2011In U.S. v. Ruff, No. 09-16304 (Jan. 5, 2011), the Court dismissed an appeal because the defendant signed an appeal waiver in connection with his guilty plea.The Court noted that appeal waivers are enforceable if they are knowing and voluntary. Here, Ruff understood the full significance of his appeal waiver...
Previous | Next
Medical Malpractice: Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar-Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?
Your New York attorney has notified the Court that your case is re...
The Grave Risk of Harm Defense in Hague Child Abduction Cases
A major debate is under way as to the future of the “grave risk ...
New Baptist Covenant Blog
Last week, I pointed to the New Baptist Convenant website, now onl...
The Mexico Trucker Blog
I've written before about the perceived problems with relaxed rest...
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
My fiance's check is DD into a local credit union. Bank seems to have a pattern of "invisibly holding" charges from the debit card until just HOURS before his DD is processed (and this is after hours, of course). Over th
Have your fiance take the information you've collected and go into the bank...
It is my understanding that the 6th Amendment requires, that if you can't afford a lawyer in a criminal case, the Court must provide a lawyer in your defense at no charge to you. However, in a civil case no such protecti
That is not entirely true, even in the case of criminal cases. The court will pr...
I was called to give a deposition for the defense and the defendant is the person who stole our car, there is a chance that I will be called to satisfy at his trial. How can I get out of this, as my husband is to testify
If you were subpoenaed for the deposition you will need to appear or face prosec...
Is it libel to write blog posts and/or online reviews about a local business that defames one's reputation?
Libel is the form of defamation expressed in fixed-- usually written form. Sland...
How can I make my blog more popular?
You have to write and submit articles, with backlinks to your blogsite....

My fiance's check is DD into a local credit union. Bank seems to have a pattern of "invisibly holding" charges from the debit card until just HOURS before his DD is processed (and this is after hours, of course). Over th
Have your fiance take the information you've collected and go into the bank...
It is my understanding that the 6th Amendment requires, that if you can't afford a lawyer in a criminal case, the Court must provide a lawyer in your defense at no charge to you. However, in a civil case no such protecti
That is not entirely true, even in the case of criminal cases. The court will pr...
I was called to give a deposition for the defense and the defendant is the person who stole our car, there is a chance that I will be called to satisfy at his trial. How can I get out of this, as my husband is to testify
If you were subpoenaed for the deposition you will need to appear or face prosec...
Is it libel to write blog posts and/or online reviews about a local business that defames one's reputation?
Libel is the form of defamation expressed in fixed-- usually written form. Sland...
How can I make my blog more popular?
You have to write and submit articles, with backlinks to your blogsite....








