OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
Of Arms and the Law 

A blog devoted to firearms law and Second Amendment theory.
Post Frequency: 24.2/day Last Entry: April 01, 2011 at 18:19:30 Recent Entries: 1960
Go to Of Arms and the Law, find other Constitutional Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Search
Posts
Virtues of Texas
Posted on June 08, 2010One reason why, if I were not an Arizonan, I'd like to be a Texan.
Brady Campaign and Helen Thomas
Posted on June 08, 2010Displaying a perfect sense of timing, Brady Campaign recently proclaimed Helen Thomas a "visionary." What's the line from The Princess Bride? "I don't tink dat word means what you tink it means, boss," something like that. Hat tip to Sixgun Sarah....
Elana Kagan's sole footprint on the Second Amendent
Posted on June 07, 2010Actually, more like a toeprint, and a light one at that. Back in 1987, when the individual rights view consisted of oh, Steve Halbrook, Joyce Malcolm, Don Kates, Bob Dowlut and myself, publishing in sundry reviews with no court taking note, a fellow named Sandidge got convicted under DC's ban and appealed...
Peter Hitchens' thoughts on the British shooter
Posted on June 06, 2010Right here. "The truth s that until 1920, Britain?s gun laws were so relaxed they made Texas look effeminate, but we had virtually no gun crime. That only really began to increase here after we abolished hanging. But that truth doesn?t fit the Leftist dogma which has everyone, including the Tories, the media and the police, in its grip, so the facts will be ignored...
US reverses stance on small arms treaty
Posted on June 06, 2010Story here. The US did say that any vote must be by consensus, to which treaty proponents are objecting. UPDATE: Prob is old news. I've just fought off one hell of an infection, am not too clear at noticing things in this exhausted state.
Former Justice Souter speaks
Posted on June 04, 2010Story here. I can understand that he doesn't seem to like textualism -- stick to the words, that's what was agreed upon -- nor original understanding -- words explained by our best understanding of what they were meant to be. But what he does propose as an interpretative tool is beyond my grasp...
Candidate for AZ governor
Posted on June 04, 2010I met Buz Mills at the annual NRA meeting. It's not often you see a serious gubernatorial candidate who owns Gunsite Academy -- I don't suppose that leaves much room for doubt on his Second Amendment views. What reminded me of this was word that he's filing an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case involving Arizona's publicly-funded elections statutes...
Correction of opinion count for Feb. 22 Sitting
Posted on June 03, 2010Double checking my count, I found I missed one that was written by Justice Breyer. That makes the count 7 decided out of 13. Writing two opinion apiece from that sitting: Kennedy, Sotomayer. Writing one each: Stevens, Scalia, Breyer. Not having released one yet: Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Roberts [above updated in light of comment].
Are we seeing a pattern here?
Posted on June 03, 2010For the second time in a week, a Chicagoan uses a banned handgun to shoot a home invader.
History Channel's "Top Shot"
Posted on June 02, 2010It premieres this Sunday evening: here's its webpage.
Reading tea leaves....
Posted on June 02, 2010The Supreme Court divides up arguments into "sittings," each of them two weeks long. McDonald v. Chicago was argued during the sitting of Feb 22. The Court's custom is to make sure each Justice writes at least one opinion from each sitting. The Feb...
DoJ readiness for weapons of mass destruction attack
Posted on June 02, 2010Justice's inspector general suggests that FBI has a plan, but all the other agencies in Justice do not.
Brady Campaign hunkers down on the Chicago case
Posted on June 01, 2010Dennis Henigan pretty much accepts a loss, and looks for a silver lining in that cloud. Good try. It cuts both ways.... how many Brady supporters will keep contributing when gun bans are ruled out, and all Brady has to hope for is, oh, permit systems and things like that -- and if the right to arms is accepted as fundamental, they'd probably have to be liberal permit schemes...
Recollection appropriate to Memorial Day....
Posted on May 31, 2010A friend told me of having been at a Thanksgiving dinner, where the diners were mostly older ladies, but included one retired Army colonel who'd served in Korea. The former were making lengthy conversation on topics that males regard as torture, and they eventually got around to "What is the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?" One described a sunset in detail, several named their grandchildren, etc...
More gun nuts, less crime?
Posted on May 31, 2010Snowflakes in Hell notes that during the week of the NRA convention, Charlotte experienced a 45% drop in criminal activity, compared to the same week a year before. Someday I'll check out a few other cities that hosted conventions in past years, and see if anyone keeps records like that.
R. Lee Ermey alive, report of death a hoax
Posted on May 31, 2010This morning I posted from an email report that R. Lee Ermey had died. This was shown to be a hoax by the best possible evidence: a commenter just saw him in Washington's Memorial Day parade! Anyway, here's my Dad's webpage (I've got to clean up the html when I have time)...
New and interesting book
Posted on May 26, 2010Implosion at Los Alamos, the story of an investigation into security gaps at our nuclear lab, including the loss or theft of no fewer than 400 computers (which may have had classified data on their drives).
"May issue" carry permits and Equal Protection
Posted on May 26, 2010Prof. Volokh notes a District Court ruling allowing a claim that an Iowa sheriff violated Equal Protection and the First Amendment by refusing a carry permit based on his political activities. Parts of the complaint were dismissed, for sundry technical reasons, and portions of the remainder may be mooted by Iowa's change to "shall issue...
NRA sues over Wilmington DE public housing gun ban
Posted on May 26, 2010So the Caesar Rodney Institute reports. The ban essentially conditions living in public housing upon giving up all firearms; possession of one in an apartment can result in immediate eviction.
80 yr old Chicagoan defends self with illegal handgun
Posted on May 26, 2010Story, at Crime, Guns, and Videotape. A masked robber, with a long rap sheet, burst into the elderly couple's home, and collided with a .38 projectile going the other way.
CCN takes on BATFE management
Posted on May 25, 2010This Wednesday and Thursday, Mary 26 & 27, CNN is to air a two part series on BATFE. Given the number of scandals, screwups and betrayals, I can see why it requires a two part series to cover, or at least begin.
Pres. Calderone's claims
Posted on May 25, 2010Bob Owen's title sums it up: He didn't just lie about Arizona: Calderone fibbed about assault weapons, too.
Culture Wars are Turning
Posted on May 25, 2010It's the title of a piece by Roger Simon. While he doesn't deal with firearms or firearms rights, it parallels my past comment on how those are shifting.
Sup. Ct. reaffirms that use of machinegun is an element, not a sentencing factor
Posted on May 24, 2010U.S. v. O'Brien, handed down today. 18 USC §924(c) provides for 5 extra years' sentence for use of a firearm in certain federal crimes, and 30 years' extra for use of a machinegun. So does that mean (1) use of the described firearms is a sentencing factor, making for a stiffer sentence for the underlying federal offense, or (2) this describes an independent crime, with elements of committing the underlying offense and of being armed while so doing? If the first, the fact of being armed can be decided by the judge during sentencing; if the second, it must be decided by the jury, since it is part of the crime...
Border issues in the old days
Posted on May 22, 2010Before the National Firearms Act, the makers of the Thompson promoted it as a way to protect ranches against border raiders. This was practical: cross border raiding remains common to this day. If you want to get anything south of the border, all it costs is $10 mordida ("bite") to the crossing guards and you vehicle will not be searched...
Rumors about Vets' Affairs being party to disarming vets
Posted on May 22, 2010A report has been going around the internet that someone (unnamed) was asked three questions by a Vet Affairs screener and then told, off the record, that if he'd answered any "yes" he would have been reported to DHS and he would be disarmed. I found the report very fishy, and it appears to be without foundation...
Brady Center muffs an amicus brief
Posted on May 20, 2010David Codrea documents the flub. Brady was out to file an amicus in the Montana case over its Firearms Freedom Law. Brady gets permission for itself to file an amicus, but files one on behalf of itself and two dozen other groups. On top of it, one of the signatory attorneys is not admitted to practice in the court, and has not applied for this-case-only ("pro haec vice") admission.
Chicago's handgun ban not very successful
Posted on May 20, 2010Chicago is experiencing a homicide surge, and the Police Superintendant ("when danger reared its ugly head / he turned his tail and bravely fled") has responded by splitting body counts into indoor killings and outdoor killings, and arguing his police can't be expected to restrain the first...
Banging head against wall
Posted on May 19, 2010From Elena Kagan's questionaire: "d. List, by case name, all cases in courts of record, including cases before administrative law judges, you tried to verdict, judgment, or final decision (rather than settled),.... i. What percentage of these trials were: 1...
Previous | Next
Related Law Articles
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









