ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Gardner & Rossi on State Constitutional Law

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS

James A. Gardner and Jim Rossi (University at Buffalo Law School, SUNY and Florida State University - College of Law) have posted Dual Enforcement of Constitutional Norms (NEW FRONTIERS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Oxford University Press, 2011) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

    This collection of essays projects a new vision for state constitutional law, reflecting a shift in legal thinking about the relationship between national and subnational systems of constitutional law. In addition to chapters by the editors, James Gardner and Jim Rossi, the collection includes chapters by Neal Devins, Helen Hershkoff, Jacob Levy, Daniel Rodriguez, Lawrence Sager, and Robert Schapiro.

    Together the essays chart a new course that gives voice to a recent, rising chorus of dissent among scholars and judges ? namely that national and subnational systems of constitutional law cannot be adequately understood in isolation from one another. To the contrary, they are linked in a web of jurisprudential, social, and pragmatic connections structured by the American system of federalism. Here, multiple layers of constitutional law function together in a complex, interdependent process in which constitutional norms are developed, articulated, and enforced.

    These essays illuminate the role that state constitutions must play in any theory of federalism, and exemplify a fresh approach to state constitutionalism by discussing a range of issues, including recent debates regarding state constitutional protections for same-sex marriage. The entire work embraces the struggle between state and national power for dominance in American law and places both on equal ground. It contends that constitutional meaning in a federal system is never static and that it evolves over time.

    In addition to covering methods of judicial review, it discusses the handling of constitutional claims by courts at the state and national level and closely examines the way that courts and constitutions protect individual rights and allocate governmental powers in a federal system.

Recommended.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on January 17, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (from cache 11/03/26 09:30:17)