ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Jacobs on Administrative Independence & Discretion

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS
Laverne Jacobs (University of Windsor - Faculty of Law) has posted Independence, Autonomy & Impartiality: Normative Understandings and the Use of Discretion by Administrative Actors on the Ground on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
    In this paper, the author examines the potential for administrative independence to be used as a site for promoting positive uses of discretion. Using field experiences drawn from an ethnographic study of the concept of "tribunal independence? in Canadian access to information and privacy commissions, the author argues that the type of independence labeled as institutional independence in the jurisprudence provides not only for the setting of routine administrative tasks such as the assignment of cases and sittings, itt also denotes a much richer discretionary realm in which administrative actors use their discretion to set the foundational norms and values that guide all aspects of the decision-making process at their institution. This norm-setting element of institutional independence is highly influenced by the institutional culture of the administrative body itself.

    Three examples from the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario and the federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner are examined to illustrate how administrative actors? normative understandings of the work that they do, coupled with understandings of independence, autonomy and impartiality may lead to results that garner varying degrees of public confidence. Theorizing from the empirical findings in the field, the author argues that the dialogic model of discretion, which requires administrative actors and the public to ensure authentic exchanges before discretionary decisions are rendered, should be expanded beyond the context of individual cases. By encouraging administrative actors to use a dialogic model as part of broader foundational norm-setting, there is a greater chance that the programmatic values set at this level will resonate with legitimate public expectations of fairness and the rule of law. Such a dialogic model is one tool that can be used in seeking to achieve good governance at the administrative level.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on May 11, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0036 secs (from cache 11/06/26 16:13:32)