ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Feminist Law Professors

If You Live in California, Vote No on Proposition 8

By Ann Bartow

ADVERTISEMENTS

From this Feminist Law Prof co-authored Op-Ed:

Fifty years from now, we will surely look back, with shame, at society’s mistreatment of people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (”LGBT”). It is an unfortunate feature of democracies that the majority can pass laws that disfavor minority groups. This country’s history of legally sanctioned segregation, “separate but [supposedly] equal” education and bans on interracial marriage were products of democratic institutions not yet ready to fully integrate racial minorities into society.

This country, however, was not built on the premise that majority will should rule on all matters; on the contrary, the American legal system was fashioned specifically to protect against the tyranny of the majority. Throughout this country’s history, minority groups have thus counted upon courts to preserve rights guaranteed by our federal and state constitutions. Those documents guarantee to all citizens both due process and equal protection, enduring but also flexible concepts that over time have moved society closer to realizing the guarantee in our Declaration of Independence that “all [people] are created equal.” …

… Historically, California has been at the forefront in protecting minority rights. Even before Brown v. Board of Education, California courts found “separate but equal” education to be inconsistent with state constitutional requirements with regard to its Latino population. Moreover, in Perez v. Sharp, California banned the prohibition on interracial marriage 19 years before the U.S. Supreme Court reached the same conclusion in 1967.

The California Supreme Court’s recent decision extending rights to same-sex couples is in line with a noble history that is relatively progressive compared with some sister states and even the federal government. Should Prop. 8 pass, it would represent a significant departure from that history, and condemn California to a few more years of shameful discrimination against the LGBT community with respect to the important right to marry the person of one’s choice.

Read it in full here.

–Francine Lipman

Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on October 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 10/31/26 21:40:07)