Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateWhy are banks so reluctant to lend?
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
Douglas Diamond and Ragu Rajan suggest a clever answer:
Perhaps, however, it is not just the fear of being short of funds to meet creditor demands that drives the reluctance of even healthy banks to lend, but the fear of being short of funds if investment opportunities get even better. Take, for example, the possibility that a large indebted financial institution becomes distressed in the future and starts dumping assets in the market.
Not only will the price of those assets fall if there are only a few entities with the liquid funds to buy them, the absorption of market liquidity by the distressed institution will ensure that it will be very hard for any institution that does not already have liquid funds to borrow at that time. If financial institutions expect that those with liquidity could make a killing in the future (by buying financial assets or banks at fire sale prices), they will restrict their lending or investment today to very short maturities or liquid securities and not lock up liquidity in term loans. The point is that it need not be ?own? distress that prevents a bank from lending, expectations of liquidity shortages that may cause other distressed entities to sell in a future fire sale can be enough.
Economists are good at sitting in their offices and inventing clever answers, but is there any empirical basis for this story? The logic is easy enough to follow, but it seems rather far-fetched as a business strategy because it depends on an expectation of future (toxic) asset dumping. Given the government's aggressive interventions in the market for toxic assets, I just don't see that happening.
In the meantime, Lucian Bebchuk takes another stab at fixing TARP II with his W$J editorial, "How to Avoid Overpaying for Toxic Assets."
Hmm. I sort of thought that was the point of TARP II.
Full post as published by Conglomerate on April 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Wesley A. Snyder et al.
alleging the consultants perpetrated a Ponzi scheme by encouraging borrowers to lend more than they needed.

UPDATE: Chinese Regulators Give Green Light to Borrow from Foreign Banks
Rumor: China Banking Regulators Tell Local Banks Not to Lend to U.S. Banks
Regulators to Banks: We Want You To Lend, But...
More on Closing Chinese Factories








