ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> Class Action Defense Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Class Action

: Class Action Defense Blog

Class Action Defense Cases—In re LandAmerica: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Plaintiff Motion To Centralize Class Action Litigation In District of South Carolina

By Michael J. Hassen

ADVERTISEMENTS

Judicial Panel Grants Defense Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and Agrees to Transfers Class Actions to District of South Carolina

Two class actions – one in California and one in South Carolina – were filed against various defendants, including LandAmerica and SunTrust Banks, “on behalf of individuals and entities that sought to enter into a Section 1031 tax-deferred exchange and entrusted money to facilitate the exchange with the qualified intermediary LandAmerica 1031 Exchange Services, Inc.” but who “lost their investment due to alleged misconduct by various defendants, including SunTrust, where most such funds were deposited.” In re Landamerica 1031 Exchange Serv., Inc., Internal Revenue Service § 1031 Tax Deferred Exch. Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. June 12, 2009) [Slip Opn., at 1]. Plaintiffs in the South Carolina class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in that district or in the District of Nevada; plaintiffs in the California class action supported the motion, but while they did not oppose pretrial coordination in Nevada, they requested centralization either in South Carolina or California. Id. SunTrust also did not oppose centralization, but requested transfer to Georgia or Virginia, and three individual defendants supported transfer to Virginia. Id. The Judicial Panel granted the motion to centralize the class action lawsuits and agreed that the District of South Carolina was the appropriate transferee court because it was “nearer to SunTrust’s headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, where relevant documents and witnesses are likely to be found.” Id., at 1-2. Accordingly, it ordered the class actions to be centralized in the District of South Carolina, id., at 2.

Download PDF file of In re Landamerica 1031 Exchange Serv., Inc., Internal Revenue Service § 1031 Tax Deferred Exchange Litigation Transfer Order

Full post as published by Class Action Defense Blog on July 31, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0031 secs (from cache 11/01/26 21:26:49)