Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005Defendants' CAFA Argument Goes Limp ...The Long and Short of Sterility and Bananas
Villareal v. Dole Food Company, Inc., et al., 09:-cv-00189 (C.D. CA. 01/29/09)
Thousands of banana plantation farmers in Latin America have filed suits in California state courts against some of the most recognizable banana vendors in the world. Their claims you ask: exposure to pesticides and chemicals have resulted in serious injuries, including sterility. The CAFA Law Blog appreciates that sterility is a sensitive issue, so let's just refer to it in this post as the 'banana problem.'
The plaintiffs with the banana problem elected not to bring one class action, but rather divided alphabetically and by country into several cases against the various vendors. Each class had less than 100 plaintiffs, just like banana bunches sprouting from the same tree.
The defendants were not impressed by this procedural posture, apparently thinking that some of these green bananas just weren't ripe … or maybe some were shriveled and mushy … who knows what the defendants were thinking. Maybe they were thinking about plantains (which can also be green and shaft-like)? And just why are plantains different from bananas? Who knows? Anyway, the defendants argued that these individual actions should be considered one action under CAFA to make it amenable for removal to the federal system.
The district court ruled that defendants had slipped on their own banana peel, rejecting their CAFA arguments. The court noted that removal statutes are strictly construed, that the actions were not mass actions under CAFA, and that nothing in CAFA suggested that plaintiffs could not bring multiple actions to keep their claims in state court. The court ordered additional briefing on why it should not remand back to state court.
Will the plaintiff end up with banana splits or just banana pudding? We will keep you UP to date
Full post as published by CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on June 02, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
LA Weight Loss
Recalls LA Hot Drinks Café Au Lait
Evergreen
Wachovia, Settle Securities Allegations over Ultra Short Opportunities Fund
Pesticides
Long-Term Exposure Linked to Diabetes
Long-Term Insurance Suit
Settled for $15 Million
UnumProvident
for allegedly denying long-term disability claims.
Bell Canada
alleging wrongful charging for long distance phone calls

The Dole Pesticide Case: Bananas, Sterility and Videotape
U.S. Supreme Court hears argument in CAFA case: Hertz Corp. v. Friend
How is the Class Action Fairness Act working
CAFA and the Home State Exception
Seventh Chastises Ninth for Encouraging Mickey Mouse Law Suits







