Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerRehearing petition filed in Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
On February 17, 2009, a petition for rehearing was filed in the Supreme Court CLRA case, Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, no. S153846. The opinion is available here: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., ___ Cal.4th ___, 2009 WL 197560 (Jan. 29, 2009). See these blog posts for more.
Thanks to a loyal blog reader, here are copies of the petition for rehearing and an amicus letter filed by eight consumer advocacy groups in support of the petition.
Under Rules of Court 8.268 and 8.536, the Supreme Court would need to either grant or deny rehearing, or extend its time to do so, within thirty days after the opinion was filed on January 29. Thirty days from January 29 is Saturday, February 28. As a practical matter, that means the Court can be expected to take action on or before its conference scheduled for the preceding Wednesday, February 25 -- i.e., in two days. If the Court takes no action before the thirty-day deadline, the petition is deemed denied.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on February 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
Sprint-Nextel
Sued for $1 Billion Plus in Federal Class Action
Sprint Settles ETF Class Action for $17.5 Million
Sprint Settles ETF Class Action for $17.5 Million
Sprint Nextel
alleging violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Sprint Nextel
Early Termination Fees Ruled Illegal in California
Sprint Nextel Corp.
allegedly defrauded wireless customers by charging unspecified roaming fees.
Sprint
Receives Preliminary Approval of $17.5 Settlement for Early Termination Fees

Sprint/Clearwire WiMAX promises
Rehearing Petition Filed in Marriage Cases
New Filing in Level 3 Communications v. City of St. Louis
Is Louisiana working on its Kennedy rehearing petition Will Gov. Jindal stay true to his word









