Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast email to Union Leader's counsel Greg & Kate Sullivan on the KingCast/Jesseman case to obtain IP address of bogus poster.

By Christopher King

See generally this Harvard law blog post, but check the case of Remsburg v. Docusearch, 149 N.H. 148 as noted in the comments. Yah, I know Attorney Gottesman, he's a State Senator and I'm going to tell him all about this case.

Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
Subject: Remsburg v. Docusearch
To: [Blankety-blank private email addy]
CC: kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com

Counselors:

Look Mr. Jesseman or me or Judge Lynn straight in the
eye and tell us that the anonymous poster has not run
afoul of the Remsburg standard.....

From the Post Hearing Brief:

D: Summary
All you have in this World guaranteed are your thoughts. And once the Court allows people to steal those unique thoughts and to use them -- indeed misappropriate them for their own political or financial gain and not as satire, while falsely purporting to be the "signatory" -- we really have no reason to proclaim America to be the Land of the Free. People could just steal your thoughts under imprimatur of the Court and use them to promote the causes to which you are diametrically opposed. There?s no Court in the World that should condone that activity.

It's like pornography: Petitioners cannot define the line but we know when we see it; know when it has been crossed. To continue that analogy, there was no Literary, Artistic, Political or Scientific matter to the false post, and what political value it may have had?.. was a lie.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on March 18, 2008 (boomark / email).