Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> First Amendment Center
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: First Amendment CenterSchumer: No protection for Wikileaks in media-shield bill
By By The Associated Press,
First Amendment Cente
WASHINGTON ? The sponsor of a bill to protect journalists' confidential sources in federal courts says he will make certain the Wikileaks website will not be shielded.
Wikileaks posted more than 75,000 classified Afghanistan war records on its website last month.
Sen. Charles Schumer said yesterday that the existing media-shield bill includes language that would exempt Wikileaks from the protection. But the New York Democrat says he will write new language in the Free Flow of Information Act as an extra safeguard.
?Neither WikiLeaks, nor its original source for these materials, should be spared in any way from the fullest prosecution possible under the law,? Schumer said in an Aug. 4 statement. ?Although the bill in no way shields anyone who broke the law from prosecution, we are going the extra mile to remove even a scintilla of doubt.?
Schumer says he and Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., are working with the newspaper industry in crafting the new language. Schumer added that the new language ?will explicitly exclude organizations like Wikileaks ? whose sole or primary purpose is to publish unauthorized disclosures of documents ? from possible protection.?
Paul J. Boyle, senior vice president for public policy at the Newspaper Association of America, was quoted by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press as saying: ?Senate sponsors want to shore this up by stating it is not their intention to cover WikiLeaks-type websites that simply publish raw data without editorial oversight.?
Boyle told The New York Times that Wikileaks? recent document releases might prompt more support for the shield bill. According to the newspaper, Boyle ?contended that the increasing use of subpoenas to pressure reporters to identify sources created incentive for would-be leakers to send material to a group like WikiLeaks rather than to a traditional news organization subject to American law and having editorial controls and experience in news judgment.?
The media-shield proposal was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in December 2009 and is pending before the full Senate.
Full post as published by First Amendment Center on August 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Transportation Equity Act of 2005
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Phone Bill Reduction
Qwest agrees to $16 million settlement in overcharging lawsuit.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Settle with California
Blue Cross Blue Shield
alleging they have refused coverage for austic children
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
Nielsen Media Challenged
TV ratings company to pay undisclosed settlement in antitrust lawsuit.
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.

What the US Media Shield Bill Means for Bloggers & Citizen Journalists
House Passes Media Shield Bill
Federal media shield bill sputters in the Senate
"Bush Officials Oppose Media Shield Bill"
Sen. Schumer's Bill Provides Tax Incentives to Kill Bambi
Australia Censors Wikileaks Page








