Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> ACS Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: ACS BlogWhite House Threatens To Veto Employment Discrimination Legislation
Yesterday, the White House threatened to veto legislation that "would make it easier for victims of discrimination to sue their employers over unequal pay," the Washington Post reported. The legislation, known as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007, seeks to overturn a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber. In that case, the Court narrowly interpreted employment discrimination law to prohibit a lawsuit for gender-based pay discrimination unless the discrimination occurred within 180 days of the plaintiff's filing suit, regardless of when she found out about the discrimination. A Congressional Research Service Report explained the issues at play in Ledbetter:
In Ledbetter, the female plaintiff alleged that past sex discrimination had resulted in lower pay increases and that these past pay decisions continued to affect the amount of her pay throughout her employment, resulting in a significant pay disparity between her and her male colleagues by the end of her nearly twenty year career. Under Title VII, a plaintiff is required to file suit within 180 days after an alleged unlawful employment practice has occurred. Although the plaintiff in Ledbetter argued that each paycheck she received constituted a new violation of the statute and therefore reset the clock with regard to filing a claim, the Court rejected this argument, reasoning that even if employees suffer continuing effects from past discrimination, their claims are time barred unless filed within the specified number of days of the original discriminatory act.
Catherine Fisk, Duke University professor of law, previewed the Ledbetter case in this blog post. Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Counsel at the National Women's Law Center, provided additional analysis of the case and the legislation before Congress. The Post also ran this editorial. ACS explored three other employment discrimination cases before the Court in this press briefing from February 2008.
Full post as published by ACS Blog on April 23, 2008 (boomark / email).
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
House Closing
Sealing a home sale
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Housing Buyer Discrimination
White homeowner settles $30,000 buyer-discrimination lawsuit.
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.
Middle Eastern Discrimination
Cruise lines to pay $485,000 settlement in employment lawsuit.
Pregnancy Discrimination
NutriSystem agrees to pay $82,500 settlement in employment lawsuit..
Massachusetts Employment Law
alleging violations of Massachusetts labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination, harassment and more.

White House Announces New EEOC Nominee
White House Spinning Its Wheels on Presidents Drill & Veto Energy Policies
House Again Passes Defense Authorization, Refutes Pocket Veto Claim
Majority Leader Hoyer Calls Veto Deeply Misguided
Bush Threatens Veto of Intelligence Budget: Too Much Oversight
"G.O.P. Set to Block Bill Easing Limits on Pay Discrimination Suits"







