Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> 43(B)log
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: 43(B)logZynga and 230
By Rebecca Tushnet
ADVERTISEMENTS
Eric Goldman says everything I would have about Swift v. Zynga Game Network, Inc., No. C09-05443 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2010), so I won't, other than to say that it's really disappointing to see a court talking about a service provider's control of "design, layout, and format" as having any relevance to a 230 defense. Unless the design, layout, and format make the content illegal (which I can only imagine if they omitted/obscured important information required by law to be disclosed that the underlying content provider had attempted to provide), they are simply irrelevant to responsibility for the unlawful content.Full post as published by 43(B)log on November 11, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Zynga files four more lawsuits
Report: Zynga Displeased with Farmville Performance on MSN Zone
Zynga, Digital Chocolate Go to the Mattresses Over Mafia Wars Name
Case Settled: Zynga v. CLZ Concepts (Filed 2/27/09, N.D. Cal.)
Trade Secrets: Zynga vs. Playdom
Court scales back Zyngas attempts to learn about anonymous Mafia Wars infringers








