ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

The Director Compensation Project: Oracle

By Mark Dunn

ADVERTISEMENTS

This post is part of an ongoing series that is examining stock exchange rules and director independence. We are including a mix of companies from the Fortune 100 list for 2007 and using the information disclosed in each company’s 2008 proxy statements. In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges have each adopted their own standards for director independence. Meeting stock exchange requirements is mandatory for most listed companies.

NASDAQ Rule 4350(c)(1) requires that the boards of all listed companies be comprised of a majority of independent directors. The definition of “independent director,” found in Rule 4200(a)(15) , leaves the decision on whether a director is independent up to the discretion of the board. The Rule does, however, provide a number of factors that automatically disqualify a director from being deemed independent; one of which is any compensation from the company over $100,000 during any one-year period in the last three years, excluding director’s fees. It is worth mentioning that this is a comewhat stricter standard than what is required by NYSE Rule 303A.02(b)(ii) , which only considers direct compensation.  Members of the audit committee are restricted further in their compensation by Rule 4350(d) .

One can see some of the effects of these rules when looking at the director compensation table from Oracle’s (ORCL-NASDAQ) 2008 proxy statement. According to the proxy statement, directors were paid the following amounts:

Name

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)

Stock Awards
($)

 

Option Awards
($)

 

All Other Compensation
($)

 

Total
($)

 

Jeffrey S. Berg

149,391

—

141,829

—

291,220

Raymond Bingham

218,500

—

154,540

—

373,040

Michael J. Boskin

202,500

—

258,748

—

461,248

Hector Garcia-Molina

131,500

—

141,829

—

273,329

Jack F. Kemp

74,500

—

141,829

—

216,329

Donald L. Lucas

216,500

—

333,245

—

549,745

Naomi O. Seligman

106,391

—

177,378

—

283,769

Director Compensation. Oracle’s board met ten times last year. Board members are required to attend at least seventy-five percent of the total number of board meetings. Directors Bingham, Boskin and Lucas, who each made more than $200,000 in cash fees, are all members of the board’s Finance and Audit Committee. That committee met twenty times in 2007, twice as many times as any other board committee.  On average, the non-employee directors received $349,811 in total compensation for their services. As the above table indicates, much of the non-employee directors’ compensation came in the form of option awards; five directors received more in option awards than fees paid in cash. Six of the seven non-employee directors received more than $100,000 in cash. Three received more than $200,000 in fees paid in cash.

Director Tenure. Three of the non-employee directors have served on the board for seven years or less. Donald L. Lucas, a former Chairman of the Board, has the longest tenure at twenty-eight years. All of the directors attended at least seventy-five percent of the total number of board meetings. Many of the directors also sit on other boards; collectively, the seven directors sit on the boards of eleven other companies.

CEO Compensation. The total compensation paid in 2007 to the CEO, Larry Ellison, was $61,180,524, only $1,000,000 of which came in the form of cash. This included $1,724,424 in "other compensation," of which, $1,708,763 came from security-related costs and expenses for his residences. Oracle did not include Mr. Ellison’s corporate jet use towards "other compensation" but did disclose that such expenses amounted to only $44,460.  Fourteen percent ($8,369,000) of his compensation was tied to performance incentives. Option awards ($50,087,100) made up the remaining compensation which value is dependent upon company performance.

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on May 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/06/26 15:57:07)