Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA4: GSR swab as SI justified by exigency of GSR easily disappearing
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
GSR test at the police station shortly after arrest was constitutionally valid because of exigent circumstances. United States v. Simmons, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10892 (4th Cir. May 27, 2010) (unpublished):
Recently, the Fifth Circuit concluded that a GSR test is a reasonable search incident to arrest. United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 793, 795-96 (5th Cir. 2006). As the court explained, "[b]ecause the presence of gun powder on his hands was relevant evidence that [the defendant] (or merely time) could have eventually removed or destroyed, if his arrest was valid, the performance of the gun powder residue test was lawful, and the admission of the results at trial was proper." Id. at 795-96. Such a result is dictated by Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on May 30, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

UC-Berkeley Asks Incoming Freshmen for DNA Sample to Measure Ability to Metabolize Alcohol
Do missing Somali men have an al-Qaida connection
FMLA: One Way to Define a Service Member's 'Qualifying Exigency'








