ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA8: No requirement SW name the defendant
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The search of defendant's car was justified under the automobile exception because it was readily mobile and there was probable cause. As to the search of his house, there is no requirement that the search warrant name the defendant. United States v. Blaylock, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16192 (8th Cir. July 31, 2008)*:
Within this framework, we consider whether the search of the blue Nissan comports with the Fourth Amendment. The testimony about King driving the Nissan to meet Detective Ropka demonstrates that the Nissan was readily mobile. And, the car's registration to Blaylock and King indicates it was subject to regulations that necessarily diminished any expectation of privacy in the vehicle. The question, then, is whether probable cause existed for the search...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on August 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Language Requirements for Citizenship
Naturalization without an English language test
Lawsuits and Settlements
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Duress Defense Denied to Reentry Defendant
Fourth District: Notice of Trial
Court Says Defendant Did Not Show AA Meetings Were Religious








