Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Third Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Third Circuit Blog"Departure" or "Variance," that is the Question
By Candace Hom, Melinda Ghilardi, Nancy Rimmer, Sarah Gannett, Renee Pietropaolo and Tieffa Harper
ADVERTISEMENTS
District courts must speak clearly before striking with a big stick, the Court reiterates in United States v. Brown, No. 08-1221, vacating a child pornography sentence when the record left ambiguous whether the district court had "departed" upward pursuant to a Guidelines application note or "varied" upward on the basis of its own statutory sentencing discretion. The remand follows the Court?s construction of the application note in a manner favoring the defendant.Reaffirming that punctilious care in Guidelines calculations is essential even under an advisory regime ? an approach from which the Second Circuit recently endorsed exceptions (opinion here) ? the Court reminded that it "expressly distinguish[es] between departures from the guidelines and variances from the guidelines...continue to full postFull post as published by Third Circuit Blog on August 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Upward Variance Presumed Reasonable
Irizarry: 32(h) does not require notice of contemplated variance
Valdes: No reasons for extraordinary variance








