Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Defense Newsletter Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Defense Newsletter BlogDorsey: No Impermissible 5K1.1 refusal
By Tim Cone
ADVERTISEMENTS
In U.S. v. Dorsey, No. 06-16698 (Jan. 9, 2009), the Court, upon sua sponte reconsideration of its prior decision, vacated its prior opinion and substituted another, finding that there was sufficient corroborating information in affidavits supporting search warrants, and holding that the government did not unconstitutionally punish Dorsey when it refused to file a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 5K1.1 when he decided to trial on the charged drug trafficking offenses.The Court pointed out that the government?s offer of a 5K1.1 substantial assistance motion was conditioned on Dorsey?s entry of a guilty plea. The offer was made in the context of a plea negotiation. Accordingly, the government?s subsequent refusal to file a 5K1.1 motion when Dorsey did not plead guilty was constitutionally permissible...continue to full postFull post as published by Defense Newsletter Blog on January 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Failure to File a 5K1.1 Is a Violation of Due Process If. . .
Patent Associate - Law Firm - Seattle, Wash.
Law-Firm CLE as Client Development
Remembering Leon Dorsey on his execution day








