Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentHypothetical gun is not exigent circumstance
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
A hypothetical possibility defendant might have had a gun in the house is not an exigent circumstance. United States v. Risner, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102170 (N.D. Ind. December 17, 2008):
No exigent circumstances justified the officers' entry into the residence. The government notes that Mr. Risner was known to have a firearm and could have begun firing at those outside the residence; Mr. Risner was known to drive while intoxicated in the past, was known to be intoxicated, and so might have taken to the road. It's true that nothing absolutely prevented these possibilities, but they were no more than hypothetical possibilities, not an apparent urgency that justified making what would have been an unreasonable search for Mr. Risner under other circumstances...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on December 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Beyond Critical Loss: Properly Applying the Hypothetical Monopolist Test
A Practical Guide to the Hypothetical Monopolist Test for Market Definition
No Yardwork, its the First Saturday in May.
Hypothetical Judgments and Legal Malpractice









