Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Law Of Criminal Defense
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Law Of Criminal DefenseDon't cite Wikipedia
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Eighth Circuit reversed a BIA determination for relying on Wikipedia because the website is not authoritative of anything. Badasa v. Attorney General, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18603 (8th Cir. August 28, 2008).
We conclude that the case must be remanded for further proceedings, because the BIA failed adequately to explain its conclusion that Badasa did not establish her identity. See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 94-95, 63 S. Ct. 454, 87 L. Ed. 626 (1943). The BIA did not adopt the entirety of the IJ's reasoning for rejecting Badasa's claim. Rather, the BIA acknowledged that it was improper for the IJ to consider information from Wikipedia in evaluating Badasa's submission on remand, and the government does not dispute that conclusion here...continue to full postFull post as published by Law Of Criminal Defense on September 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Failing grades blamed on Wikipedia instead of at themselves
Forge Consulting and "Structured Asse" Attempt to Promote Themselves On Wikipedia
Old New York Civil Law Poll About the Wikipedia








