Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklythis week’s edition now available
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
From this week’s edition:
Leading off this edition is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s holding in Commonwealth v. Edward Bracey. Bracey requested a jury trial in postconviction on his “Atkins claim.” The trial court, and later the state supreme court, denied that request. The trial court, however, should have conducted an evidentiary hearing on the “Atkins claim” and not simply made a ruling based on the paper record. The Court, subsequently remands, following a interesting discussion on the intersection of Ring & Atkins, for a testimonial hearing of the claim
In the news Adam Liptak comments in the New York Times on the ALI Capital Punishment Resolution. NPR reports that “[p]rosecutors sought the death penalty less often in 2009, while judges and juries handed down fewer death sentences, making it the year with the fewest people sent to death row since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on January 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Monday Morning Jumpstart: short week edition
Monday Morning Jumpstart: Halfway through May edition
Monday Morning Jumpstart: Presidents Day Edition








