Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Election-Campaign Law
: Election UpdatesElection experiences panel
By Paul Gronke
I’ve been asked about the Thursday 8 am panel. Here are the papers.
22-8 Election Experiences
Date: Thursday, April 2 8:00 am
Chair(s): Herbert Weisberg, Ohio State University
Paper(s): Paper 1: Voter ID in the 2008 General Election
This paper examines variations in the implementation of voter identification laws across the 50 states in the 2008 presidential election.
R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology
Andrew Sinclair, California Institute of Technology
Voter Confidence in the 2008 General Election
This paper examines the growing literature on voter confidence and considers the administrative, political, and socio-economic factors that affect whether a voter is confident that their ballot is counted accurately.
Morgan Llewellyn, California Institute of Technology
R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology
Paper 4. The Voting Experience: Precincts vs Absentee Voting
There is a large and growing literature on the precinct voting experience. Much less consideration has been given to the absentee voting experience. This paper compares the two to determine factors that affect the voting experience across modes.
Thad E. Hall, University of Utah
Voting Technology in the 2008 General Election
Voting technology has been a key issue in the study of election administration since the 2000 election. This paper examines how different voting technologies may affect the experience that voters have at the polls in the 2008 elections.
Charles Stewart, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Is There Racial Discrimination At The Polls?
This paper examines the critical question of whether black and white voters have similar experiences at the polls on election day and if there are systematic factors that explain these differences.
Stephen Ansolabehere, Harvard University
Discussant(s): Michael McDonald, George Mason University
Full post as published by Election Updates on March 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Insignia
26-Inch Flat-Panel LCD TVs Recalled
Gulf War Syndrome
Panel Confirms it's Real, and Identifies Causes
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA

Find Jurors' Experiences At Jury Experiences
Georgetown Hosts Careers in Tax Law Panel Today
Kenya president appoints commission to investigate election results
Interviews: Do men and women have different experiences







